Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26433746›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2015

Activity of temocillin, mecillinam, ceftazidime, and ceftazidime/avibactam against carbapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae without carbapenemase production.

N T Mutters, S Zimmermann, M Kaase, A Mischnik

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The mecillinam resistome inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026
    Article
  2. New Perspectives on Antimicrobial Agents: Pivmecillinam.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Results from a ProspectiveAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

N T MuttersDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
S ZimmermannDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
M KaaseNational Reference Laboratory for Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria, Department of Medical Microbiology, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
A MischnikDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. alexander.mischnik@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DERuhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment options for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections are scarce and therefore alternatives with a narrow spectrum or new agents are sought. Antimicrobial susceptibility to temocillin, mecillinam, ceftazidime, and ceftazidime/avibactam was determined using Etest and disk diffusion according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) methodology. A total of 77 carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae were studied, including Klebsiella pneumoniae (26%), Escherichia coli (26%), Enterobacter cloacae (26%), and Enterobacter aerogenes (22%). Several phenotypic tests, PCRs followed by sequencing and a microbiological bioassay excluded carbapenemase production in all isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility rates were low for temocillin (15.6%, minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] range 2 to >1,024 μg/ml), moderate for mecillinam (59.7%, MIC range 0.25 to >256 μg/ml), and excellent for ceftazidime/avibactam (100%, zone diameter range 19 to 32 mm, median 25 mm). 5.2% of the isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime alone (zone diameter range 6 to 32 mm). In this study, mecillinam exhibited moderate and ceftazidime/avibactam excellent in vitro antimicrobial activity against carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae without carbapenemase production. Ceftazidime/avibactam was able to restore previously reduced susceptibility to ceftazidime in all isolates, thus potentiating its activity. Temocillin only exhibited low in vitro antimicrobial activity against the isolates. Further evaluation of mecillinam and ceftazidime/avibactam with regard to the potential clinical utility against infections caused by these pathogens has to be performed.

Indexed as

beta-Lactam ResistanceBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-LactamsDNA, BacterialEnterobacter cloacaeEnterobacteriaceaeEscherichia coliHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNABacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-LactamscarbapenemaseDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID26433746
OpenAlexW2466231021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.