Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26433590›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2016

Sleeve Gastrectomy Reduces Body Weight and Improves Metabolic Profile also in Obesity-Prone Rats.

Rafael Moncada, Sara Becerril, Amaia Rodríguez, Leire Méndez-Giménez, Beatriz Ramírez, Victoria Catalán, Javier Gómez-Ambrosi, M Jesús Gil, Secundino Fernández, Javier A Cienfuegos and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Does bariatric surgery improve adipose tissue function?Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rafael MoncadaCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Sara BecerrilCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Amaia RodríguezCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Leire Méndez-GiménezCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz RamírezCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Victoria CatalánCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Gómez-AmbrosiCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
M Jesús GilCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Secundino FernándezCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Javier A CienfuegosCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Víctor ValentíCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Gema FrühbeckCIBEROBN, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. gfruhbeck@unav.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSusceptibility to obesity is associated with a notable inter-individual variation. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) on weight loss and metabolic profile in obesity-prone (OP) rats vs animals that are non-susceptible to obesity (NSO).

methodsYoung male Wistar rats (n = 101) were put in a diet-induced obesity (DIO) programme with ad libitum access to a high-fed diet (HFD) during 12 months. Body weight and food intake were regularly registered. Thereafter, rats were ranked by final body weight to identify the obesity-prone (OP) (n = 13) and non-susceptible to obesity (NSO) (n = 14) animals. OP and NSO rats were submitted to surgical interventions (sham operation, SG and pair-fed to the amount of food eaten by sleeve-gastrectomized rats). Body weight, food intake, energy expenditure, body temperature, fat pads weight, and metabolic profiling were analysed 4 weeks after surgical or dietary interventions.

resultsSG in both OP and NSO rats decreased body weight as compared to sham and pair-fed groups (P < 0.05), mainly due to reductions in subcutaneous and perirenal fat mass (P < 0.001). Total weight loss achieved in sleeve-gastrectomized OP and NSO rats was higher than that of pair-fed ones (P < 0.05), showing that the SG effect goes beyond caloric restriction. In this regard, sleeve-gastrectomized rats exhibited significantly (P < 0.05) increased basal rectal temperature together with upregulated brown adipose tissue Ucp-1 protein expression levels. A significant (P < 0.05) improvement in insulin sensitivity was also observed in both OP and NSO animals that underwent SG as compared with pair-fed counterparts.

conclusionOur findings provide the first evidence that obesity-prone rats also benefit from surgery responding effectively to SG, as evidenced by the significant body weight reduction and the metabolic profile improvement.

Indexed as

GastrectomyMetabolomeAnimalsBody WeightDisease Models, AnimalDisease SusceptibilityMaleObesityRatsRats, WistarWeight LossDiet-induced obesityObesity phenotypesObesity-proneSleeve gastrectomySusceptibility

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.