Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26433587›Full record

ArticleTransgenic research2016

Transportable data from non-target arthropod field studies for the environmental risk assessment of genetically modified maize expressing an insecticidal double-stranded RNA.

Aqeel Ahmad, Ignacio Negri, Wladecir Oliveira, Christopher Brown, Peter Asiimwe, Bernard Sammons, Michael Horak, Changjian Jiang, David Carson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transgenic research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Impact of TransgenicPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Update of Argentina's Regulatory Policies on the Environmental Risk Assessment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The impact of Bt maize expressing the Cry1Ac protein on non-target arthropods.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aqeel AhmadMonsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA. aqeel.ahmad@monsanto.com.
Ignacio NegriMonsanto Company, Fontezuela Research Station Route 8, km214, CP2700, Pergamino, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Wladecir OliveiraMonsanto Company, Dionisio Bortolotti Avenue, km 0.5, Caixa Postal 9, Santa Cruz das Palmeiras, São Paulo, Brazil.
Christopher BrownMonsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA.
Peter AsiimweMonsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA.
Bernard SammonsMonsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA.
Michael HorakMonsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA.
Changjian JiangMonsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA.
David CarsonMonsanto Company, 800 N. Lindbergh Boulevard, St. Louis, MO, 63141, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As part of an environmental risk assessment, the potential impact of genetically modified (GM) maize MON 87411 on non-target arthropods (NTAs) was evaluated in the field. MON 87411 confers resistance to corn rootworm (CRW; Diabrotica spp.) by expressing an insecticidal double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) transcript and the Cry3Bb1 protein and tolerance to the herbicide glyphosate by producing the CP4 EPSPS protein. Field trials were conducted at 14 sites providing high geographic and environmental diversity within maize production areas from three geographic regions including the U.S., Argentina, and Brazil. MON 87411, the conventional control, and four commercial conventional reference hybrids were evaluated for NTA abundance and damage. Twenty arthropod taxa met minimum abundance criteria for valid statistical analysis. Nine of these taxa occurred in at least two of the three regions and in at least four sites across regions. These nine taxa included: aphid, predatory earwig, lacewing, ladybird beetle, leafhopper, minute pirate bug, parasitic wasp, sap beetle, and spider. In addition to wide regional distribution, these taxa encompass the ecological functions of herbivores, predators and parasitoids in maize agro-ecosystems. Thus, the nine arthropods may serve as representative taxa of maize agro-ecosystems, and thereby support that analysis of relevant data generated in one region can be transportable for the risk assessment of the same or similar GM crop products in another region. Across the 20 taxa analyzed, no statistically significant differences in abundance were detected between MON 87411 and the conventional control for 123 of the 128 individual-site comparisons (96.1%). For the nine widely distributed taxa, no statistically significant differences in abundance were detected between MON 87411 and the conventional control. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences were detected between MON 87411 and the conventional control for 53 out of 56 individual-site comparisons (94.6 %) of NTA pest damage to the crop. In each case where a significant difference was observed in arthropod abundance or damage, the mean value for MON 87411 was within the reference range and/or the difference was not consistently observed across collection methods and/or sites. Thus, the differences were not representative of an adverse effect unfamiliar to maize and/or were not indicative of a consistent plant response associated with the GM traits. Results from this study support a conclusion of no adverse environmental impact of MON 87411 on NTAs compared to conventional maize and demonstrate the utility of relevant transportable data across regions for the ERA of GM crops.

Indexed as

Plants, Genetically ModifiedAnimalsArgentinaArthropodsBacillus thuringiensisBrazilCrops, AgriculturalEcosystemEnvironmentGlycineGlyphosateInsecticidesPopulation DensityRisk AssessmentRNA, Double-StrandedUnited StatesGlycineGlyphosateInsecticidesRNA, Double-StrandedBacillus thuringiensisEnvironmental risk assessmentGenetically modified cropInsecticidal double-stranded RNANon-target arthropodsTransportability

Identifiers

PMID26433587
PMCPMC4735227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.