Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26433554›Full record

ReviewSeminars in oncology2015

The National Clinical Trials Network: Conducting Successful Clinical Trials of New Therapies for Rare Cancers.

Anne F Schott, John J Welch, Claire F Verschraegen, Razelle Kurzrock

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Efficacy and CNS Toxicity of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Rare Cancer Brain Metastases: A Multicenter Basket Trial Analysis (NCI/SWOG S1609).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How Cancer Patients Perceive Clinical Trials (CTs) in the Era of CTs: Current Perception and Its Differences Between Common and Rare Cancers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Current Activities of the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2019
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anne F SchottDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: aschott@med.umich.edu.
John J WelchNational Cancer Institute Center for Global Health , Bethesda, MD.
Claire F VerschraegenDivision Hematology Oncology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, VT.
Razelle KurzrockDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Personalized Therapy and Clinical Trials Office UC San Diego-Moores Cancer Center, San Diego, CA.
Moores Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

SWOG Foreign AccrualsU10CA037429 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D., MEYSKENS, FRANK L. · 1985 to 2014
$205.2M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037429NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rare cancers account for 27% of neoplasms diagnosed each year, and 25% of cancer-related deaths in the United States. However, rare cancers show some of the highest response rates to targeted therapies, probably due to identification of oncogenic drivers with little interpatient variability. Although the low incidence of rare cancers makes large-scale randomized trials involving single histologies difficult to perform, drugs have been successfully developed in rare cancers using clinical trial designs that combine microscopic histologies. Such trials are being pursued within the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN), which possesses unique qualifications to perform widespread molecular screening of tumors for patient enrollment onto therapeutic clinical trials. When larger clinical trials are needed to determine optimum treatment strategies in rare cancers, the NCTN's broad reach in North America and internationally, and their ability to partner with both United States-based and international research organizations, can make these challenging studies feasible.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCooperative BehaviorBiomedical ResearchHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)NeoplasmsRare DiseasesResearch DesignUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26433554
PMCPMC4673983
OpenAlexW2153116947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.