Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26433552›Full record

ReviewSeminars in oncology2015

Genetic Testing and Tissue Banking for Personalized Oncology: Analytical and Institutional Factors.

George Miles, James Rae, Suresh S Ramalingam, John Pfeifer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Precision Oncology Comes of Age: Tumor-Agnostic Approaches.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

George MilesDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. Electronic address: gmiles@path.wustl.edu.
James RaeDepartment of Internal Medicine & Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Suresh S RamalingamDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA.
John PfeiferDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USWinship Cancer Institute

Funding

SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
SWOG U24 Funding for 2026-2027U24CA196175 · NCI · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI James Michael Rae, Nilsa Del Carmen Ramirez Milan · 2015 to 2026
$37.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized oncology, or more aptly precision oncogenomics, refers to the identification and implementation of clinically actionable targets tailored to an individual patient's cancer genomic information. Banking of human tissue and other biospecimens establishes a framework to extract and collect the data essential to our understanding of disease pathogenesis and treatment. Cancer cooperative groups in the United States have led the way in establishing robust biospecimen collection mechanisms to facilitate translational research, and combined with technological advances in molecular testing, tissue banking has expanded from its traditional base in academic research and is assuming an increasingly pivotal role in directing the clinical care of cancer patients. Comprehensive screening of tumors by DNA sequencing and the ability to mine and interpret these large data sets from well-organized tissue banks have defined molecular subtypes of cancer. Such stratification by genomic criteria has revolutionized our perspectives on cancer diagnosis and treatment, offering insight into prognosis, progression, and susceptibility or resistance to known therapeutic agents. In turn, this has enabled clinicians to offer treatments tailored to patients that can greatly improve their chances of survival. Unique challenges and opportunities accompany the rapidly evolving interplay between tissue banking and genomic sequencing, and are the driving forces underlying the revolution in precision medicine. Molecular testing and precision medicine clinical trials are now becoming the major thrust behind the cooperative groups' clinical research efforts.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingMedical OncologyPrecision MedicineTissue BanksBiomedical ResearchCooperative BehaviorData MiningGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, DNASpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID26433552
PMCPMC4705034
OpenAlexW1903713003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.