Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26433318›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2015

Effect of tight control of inflammation in early psoriatic arthritis (TICOPA): a UK multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Laura C Coates, Anna R Moverley, Lucy McParland, Sarah Brown, Nuria Navarro-Coy, John L O'Dwyer, David M Meads, Paul Emery, Philip G Conaghan, Philip S Helliwell

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 180 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
41.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01106079 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Compare Intensive Management vs Standard Care in Early Psoriatic Arthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorJulia BrownRan2008 to 2013Enrolled206ConditionsPsoriatic ArthritisArmsIntensive management or Tight control, Standard management - Control group
NCT03330769 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Ultrasound in PSoriatic Arthritis TREAtMent - UPSTREAM

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of CagliariRan2017 to 2020Enrolled250ConditionsArthritis, Psoriatic, Ultrasonography, Minimal Disease, ResidualArmsNew course of treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 467 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Methotrexate for psoriatic arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Guideline
  11. Guideline
  12. Guideline
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura C CoatesLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK.
Anna R MoverleyLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK.
Lucy McParlandClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Sarah BrownClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Nuria Navarro-CoyLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
John L O'DwyerAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
David M MeadsAcademic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Paul EmeryLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK.
Philip G ConaghanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK.
Philip S HelliwellLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: p.helliwell@leeds.ac.uk.
University of Leeds · GBNIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 18475Arthritis Research UK 18825Medical Research Council MR/L01629X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly intervention and tight control of inflammation optimise outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis but these approaches have not yet been studied in psoriatic arthritis. We aimed to assess the effect of tight control on early psoriatic arthritis using a treat-to-target approach.

methodsFor this open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with early psoriatic arthritis (<24 months symptom duration), who had not previously received treatment with any disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, were enrolled from eight secondary care rheumatology centres in the UK. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tight control (with review every 4 weeks and with escalation of treatment if minimal disease activity criteria not met) or standard care (standard therapy according to the treating clinician, with review every 12 weeks) for 48 weeks. Randomisation was done by minimisation incorporating a random element, to ensure treatment groups were balanced for randomising centre and pattern of arthritis (oligoarticular vs polyarticular). The randomisation procedure was done through a central 24-h automated telephone system based at the Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (Leeds, UK). This was an open-label study in which patients and clinicians were aware of treatment group assignment. Clinical outcomes were recorded by a masked assessor every 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% (ACR20) response at 48 weeks, analysed by intention to treat with multiple imputation for missing ACR components. Cost-effectiveness was also assessed. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01106079, and the ISCRCTN registry, number ISCRCTN30147736.

findingsBetween May 28, 2008, and March 21, 2012, 206 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive tight control (n=101) or standard care (n=105). In the intention-to-treat patient population, the odds of achieving an ACR20 response at 48 weeks were higher in the tight control group than in the standard care group (odds ratio 1·91, 95% CI 1·03-3·55; p=0·0392). Serious adverse events were reported by 20 (10%) patients (25 events in 14 [14%] patients in the tight control group and eight events in six [6%] patients in the standard care group) during the course of the study. No unexpected serious adverse events or deaths occurred.

interpretationTight control of psoriatic arthritis disease activity through a treat-to-target approach significantly improves joint outcomes for newly diagnosed patients, with no unexpected serious adverse events reported.

fundingArthritis Research UK and Pfizer.

Indexed as

AdultAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, PsoriaticDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26433318
PMCPMC4920221
OpenAlexW2068573602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.