ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2015
Creation of a new longitudinal corpus of clinical narratives.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal Annotation of German Clinical Language in Real and Synthetic Clinical Documents: Corpus Development and Baseline Tagger Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Leveraging free-text clinical records for heart disease classification through structured feature mapping.PloS one · 2026Article
- HONeYBEE: enabling scalable multimodal AI in oncology through foundation model-driven embeddings.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Cross- & multi-lingual medication detection: a transformer-based analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Clinical natural language processing for secondary uses.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024Article
- Overview of the 2022 n2c2 shared task on contextualized medication event extraction in clinical notes.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Review
- Extracting medication changes in clinical narratives using pre-trained language models.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- Capturing Individual-level Social Determinants from Clinical Text.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
- Deciphering clinical abbreviations with a privacy protecting machine learning system.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Classifying Cyber-Risky Clinical Notes by Employing Natural Language Processing.Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · 2022Article
- Transferability of neural network clinical deidentification systems.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Toward Understanding Clinical Context of Medication Change Events in Clinical Narratives.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021Article
- Cohort Selection for Clinical Trials From Longitudinal Patient Records: Text Mining Approach.JMIR medical informatics · 2019Article
- De-identification of psychiatric intake records: Overview of 2016 CEGS N-GRID shared tasks Track 1.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Review
- Automatic prediction of coronary artery disease from clinical narratives.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Article
- Identifying risk factors for heart disease over time: Overview of 2014 i2b2/UTHealth shared task Track 2.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Review
- Practical applications for natural language processing in clinical research: The 2014 i2b2/UTHealth shared tasks.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Article
- Annotating longitudinal clinical narratives for de-identification: The 2014 i2b2/UTHealth corpus.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Article
- Automated systems for the de-identification of longitudinal clinical narratives: Overview of 2014 i2b2/UTHealth shared task Track 1.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Review
- Annotating risk factors for heart disease in clinical narratives for diabetic patients.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 2014 i2b2/UTHealth Natural Language Processing (NLP) shared task featured a new longitudinal corpus of 1304 records representing 296 diabetic patients. The corpus contains three cohorts: patients who have a diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) in their first record, and continue to have it in subsequent records; patients who do not have a diagnosis of CAD in the first record, but develop it by the last record; patients who do not have a diagnosis of CAD in any record. This paper details the process used to select records for this corpus and provides an overview of novel research uses for this corpus. This corpus is the only annotated corpus of longitudinal clinical narratives currently available for research to the general research community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.