ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2015
Lessons from a modern review of the smallpox eradication files.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disentangling Temporal Trends of Clade Ib Monkeypox Virus Transmission in Burundi.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- The Intrinsically Disordered Region of HBx and Virus-Host Interactions: Uncovering New Therapeutic Approaches for HBV and Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Modelling the potential spread of Clade Ib MPXV in Asian cities.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- A multi-pronged scoping review approach to understanding the evolving implementation of the Smallpox and Polio eradication programs: what can other Global Health initiatives learn?BMC public health · 2020Article
- Ancient RNA virus epidemics through the lens of recent adaptation in human genomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- IMVAMUNEVaccines · 2020Article
- [Development of malaria vaccines-state of the art].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2020Review
- Rising HIV seroconversion rates & associated risks among employees of organization 'X': A case control study, Pakistan, 2017.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.