Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26432807›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2015

The importance of being NICE.

Annette Rid, Peter Littlejohns, James Wilson, Benedict Rumbold, Katharina Kieslich, Albert Weale

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Justice, Transparency and the Guiding Principles of the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage.International journal of health policy and management · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annette RidDepartment of Social Science, Health & Medicine, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK annette.rid@kcl.ac.uk.
Peter LittlejohnsDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, Weston Street, London SE1 3QD, UK.
James WilsonDepartment of Philosophy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Benedict RumboldDepartment of Political Science, University College London, London WC1H 9QU, UK.
Katharina KieslichDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College London, Weston Street, London SE1 3QD, UK Department of Political Science, University College London, London WC1H 9QU, UK.
Albert WealeDepartment of Political Science, University College London, London WC1H 9QU, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalHumansState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26432807
PMCPMC4622272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.