Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26432278›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Why do women invest in pre-pregnancy health and care? A qualitative investigation with women attending maternity services.

Geraldine Barrett, Jill Shawe, Beth Howden, Dilisha Patel, Obiamaka Ojukwu, Pranav Pandya, Judith Stephenson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Geraldine BarrettDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK. geraldine.barrett@brunel.ac.uk.
Jill ShaweSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK. j.shawe@surrey.ac.uk.
Beth HowdenReproductive Health, Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, WC1E 6AU, UK. beth.howden@bristol.ac.uk.
Dilisha PatelReproductive Health, Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, WC1E 6AU, UK. dilisha.patel@ucl.ac.uk.
Obiamaka OjukwuReproductive Health, Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, WC1E 6AU, UK. rmjbooj@ucl.ac.uk.
Pranav PandyaUniversity College London Hospitals, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK. pranav.pandya@uclh.nhs.uk.
Judith StephensonReproductive Health, Institute for Women's Health, UCL, London, WC1E 6AU, UK. judith.stephenson@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K006584/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the importance attributed to good pre-pregnancy care and its potential to improve pregnancy and child health outcomes, relatively little is known about why women invest in pre-pregnancy health and care. We sought to gain insight into why women invested in pre-pregnancy health and care.

methodsWe carried out 20 qualitative in-depth interviews with pregnant or recently pregnant women who were drawn from a survey of antenatal clinic attendees in London, UK. Interviewees were purposively sampled to include high and low investors in pre-pregnancy health and care, with variation in age, partnership status, ethnicity and pre-existing medical conditions. Data analysis was conducted using the Framework method.

resultsWe identified three groups in relation to pre-pregnancy health and care: 1) The "prepared" group, who had high levels of pregnancy planning and mostly positive attitudes to micronutrient supplementation outside of pregnancy, carried out pre-pregnancy activities such as taking folic acid and making changes to diet and lifestyle. 2) The "poor knowledge" group, who also had high levels of pregnancy planning, did not carry out pre-pregnancy activities and described themselves as having poor knowledge. Elsewhere in their interviews they expressed a strong dislike of micronutrient supplementation. 3) The "absent pre-pregnancy period" group, had the lowest levels of pregnancy planning and also expressed anti-supplement views. Even discussing the pre-pregnancy period with this group was difficult as responses to questions quickly shifted to focus on pregnancy itself. Knowledge of folic acid was poor in all groups.

conclusionDifferent pre-pregnancy care approaches are likely to be needed for each of the groups. Among the "prepared" group, who were proactive and receptive to health messages, greater availability of information and better response from health professionals could improve the range of pre-pregnancy activities carried out. Among the "poor knowledge" group, better response from health professionals might yield greater uptake of pre-pregnancy information. A different, general health strategy might be more appropriate for the "absent pre-pregnancy period" group. The fact that general attitudes to micronutrient supplementation were closely related to whether or not women invested in pre-pregnancy health and care was an unanticipated finding and warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultDietary SupplementsFamily Planning ServicesFemaleFolic AcidHumansLondonPreconception CarePregnancyQualitative ResearchReproductive BehaviorVitamin B ComplexYoung AdultFolic AcidVitamin B Complex

Identifiers

PMID26432278
PMCPMC4592566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.