Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26432174›Full record

ReviewPharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2015

Cocaine choice procedures in animals, humans, and treatment-seekers: Can we bridge the divide?

Scott J Moeller, William W Stoops

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. PGx-BasedCurrent neuropharmacology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Tobacco Images Choice and its Association With Craving and Dependence in People Who Smoke Cigarettes.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  9. Human laboratory models of reward in substance use disorder.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Candidate biomarkers in psychiatric disorders: state of the field.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Scott J MoellerDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States; Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: scott.moeller@mssm.edu.
William W StoopsDepartment of Behavioral Science and Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States; Department of Psychiatry, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States; Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky College of Arts and Sciences, Lexington, KY, United States. Electronic address: william.stoops@uky.edu.

Funding

Selective Monoamine Release as a Treatment for Cocaine Use DisordersR01DA036553 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
Genetic markers associated with brain structural abnormalities and drug use in human addictionK01DA037452 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI MOELLER, SCOTT J · 2015 to 2019
$778k
Neurocircuitry of impaired insight in addiction: relevance to aberrant self-related processingR21DA040046 · NIDA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MOELLER, SCOTT J · 2015 to 2016
$459k
Motivation for Cocaine and Non-Drug Reinforcers: Targeting Glutamate HomeostasisR21DA035376 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2014 to 2015
$376k
A Human Laboratory Study to Investigate Buspirone for Cocaine Use DisordersR21DA034095 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI STOOPS, WILLIAM WALTON · 2012 to 2013
$363k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA037452NIDA NIH HHS K01DA037452NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036553NIDA NIH HHS R01DA036553NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA034095NIDA NIH HHS R21DA034095NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA035376NIDA NIH HHS R21DA035376NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA040046NIDA NIH HHS R21DA040046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with cocaine use disorder chronically self-administer cocaine to the detriment of other rewarding activities, a phenomenon best modeled in laboratory drug-choice procedures. These procedures can evaluate the reinforcing effects of drugs versus comparably valuable alternatives under multiple behavioral arrangements and schedules of reinforcement. However, assessing drug-choice in treatment-seeking or abstaining humans poses unique challenges: for ethical reasons, these populations typically cannot receive active drugs during research studies. Researchers have thus needed to rely on alternative approaches that approximate drug-choice behavior or assess more general forms of decision-making, but whether these alternatives have relevance to real-world drug-taking that can inform clinical trials is not well-understood. In this mini-review, we (A) summarize several important modulatory variables that influence cocaine choice in nonhuman animals and non-treatment seeking humans; (B) discuss some of the ethical considerations that could arise if treatment-seekers are enrolled in drug-choice studies; (C) consider the efficacy of alternative procedures, including non-drug-related decision-making and 'simulated' drug-choice (a choice is made, but no drug is administered) to approximate drug choice; and (D) suggest opportunities for new translational work to bridge the current divide between preclinical and clinical research.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAnimalsChoice BehaviorCocaineCocaine-Related DisordersDelay DiscountingHumansNeuropsychological TestsCocaineChoice behaviorCocaine addictionCue reactivityDecision-makingDelay discountingLaboratory modelsSelf-administration

Identifiers

PMID26432174
PMCPMC4641437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.