Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26432093›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2015

Development and psychometric evaluation of a new patient -reported outcome measure for stroke self -management: The Southampton Stroke Self - Management Questionnaire (SSSMQ).

Emma J Boger, Matthew Hankins, Sara H Demain, Susan M Latter

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03993574 (Feasibility of a Stroke Specific Self-management Program), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03993574 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility of a Stroke Specific Self-management Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonRan2019 to 2022Enrolled28ConditionsStroke, Chronic ConditionsArmsSelf- management program, Standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma J BogerFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. e.j.boger@soton.ac.uk.
Matthew HankinsReal-World Evidence Solutions, IMS Health, London, N1 9JY, UK. mhankins@uk.imshealth.uk.
Sara H DemainFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. S.H.demain@soton.ac.uk.
Susan M LatterFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. S.M.Latter@soton.ac.uk.
University of Southampton · GBIQVIA (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2011-04-016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-management is important to the recovery and quality of life of people following stroke. Many interventions to support self-management following stroke have been developed, however to date no reliable and valid outcome measure exists to support their evaluation. This study outlines the development and preliminary investigation of the psychometric performance of a newly developed patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of self-management competency following stroke; the Southampton Stroke Self-Management Questionnaire (SSSMQ).

methodsA convenience sample of 87 people who had had a stroke completed responses to the SSSMQ, the Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and the Stroke Impact Scale. Scaling properties were assessed using Mokken Scale Analysis. Reliability and construct validity were assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), Mokken and Cronbach's reliability coefficients and Spearman rank order correlations with relevant measures.

resultsMokken scaling refined the SSSMQ to 28 scalable items. Internal consistency reliability (Mokken r = 0.89) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.928) were excellent. Hypotheses of expected correlations with additional measures held, demonstrating good evidence for construct validity.

conclusionsEarly findings suggest the Southampton Stroke Self-Management Questionnaire is a reliable and valid scale of self-management competency. The SSSMQ represents a potentially valid PROM for the evaluation of self-management following stroke.

Indexed as

Self EfficacyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePersonal SatisfactionPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSelf CareSocial SupportStrokeStroke Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID26432093
PMCPMC4592550
OpenAlexW1890529930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.