Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26431952›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2016

Feasibility of Using an Enzymatically Activatable Fluorescence Probe for the Rapid Evaluation of Pancreatic Tissue Obtained Using Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: a Pilot Study.

Kazumichi Kawakubo, Shunsuke Ohnishi, Yutaka Hatanaka, Kanako C Hatanaka, Hidetaka Hosono, Yoshimasa Kubota, Mako Kamiya, Masaki Kuwatani, Hiroshi Kawakami, Yasuteru Urano and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Fluorescence-Guided Surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2017
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Advances in fluorescent-image guided surgery.Annals of translational medicine · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kazumichi KawakuboDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita15 Nishi7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Shunsuke OhnishiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita15 Nishi7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan. sonishi@pop.med.hokudai.ac.jp.
Yutaka HatanakaDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Kanako C HatanakaDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Hidetaka HosonoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita15 Nishi7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Yoshimasa KubotaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita15 Nishi7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Mako KamiyaLaboratory of Chemical Biology and Molecular Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
Masaki KuwataniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita15 Nishi7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Hiroshi KawakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita15 Nishi7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Yasuteru UranoLaboratory of Chemical Biology and Molecular Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. uranokun@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Naoya SakamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Kita15 Nishi7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the most reliable method for the histological diagnosis of pancreatic tumors. Rapid on-site fluorescence-guided histological diagnosis was evaluated by topically applying an enzymatically activatable probe onto the EUS-FNA samples; the probe fluoresces in the presence of γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT). PROCEDURES: We evaluated GGT expression in pancreatic cancer cell lines in vitro. EUS-FNA was performed in 10 pancreatic tumors. After topical application of the probe, signal intensity was measured using a fluorescence imaging system for 13 min.

resultsGGT was expressed in Panc-1, AsPC-1, and AR42J, but not in KP4 cells. In samples from six cases, several regions of the specimens fluoresced and contained adequate tissue for pathological diagnosis. The remaining four non-fluorescent samples contained very small amounts of carcinoma, normal epithelial cells, or no epithelial cells. The signal intensity at 5 min was 25.5 ± 7.7 and 7.7 ± 0.5 in fluorescent and non-fluorescent regions, respectively (p < 0.05).

conclusionsApplication of enzymatically activatable probe onto EUS-FNA samples would be feasible for the rapid evaluation of tissues suitable for histological diagnosis.

Indexed as

AgedAnimalsCell Line, TumorEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationFeasibility StudiesFemaleFluorescent Dyesgamma-GlutamyltransferaseHumansMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceMiddle AgedPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsPilot ProjectsRatsFluorescent Dyesgamma-GlutamyltransferaseEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirationEnzymatically activatable fluorescence probeFluorescent imagingPancreatic tumorRapid on-site evaluation

Identifiers

PMID26431952
OpenAlexW1889763774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.