Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26431420›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2015

Evaluating the Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Emergency Department by Real-Time Video Recording System.

Sheng Chen, Wenjie Li, Zhonglin Zhang, Hongye Min, Hong Li, Huiqi Wang, Yugang Zhuang, Yuanzhuo Chen, Chengjin Gao, Hu Peng

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Minimizing Pulse Check Duration Through Educational Video Review.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sheng ChenEmergency Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenjie LiEmergency Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhonglin ZhangEmergency Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hongye MinNursing Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hong LiNursing Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Huiqi WangEmergency Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yugang ZhuangEmergency Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yuanzhuo ChenEmergency Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chengjin GaoEmergency Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hu PengEmergency Department, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) quality between manual CPR and miniaturized chest compressor (MCC) CPR. To improve CPR quality through evaluating the quality of our clinical work of resuscitation by real-time video recording system.

methodsThe study was a retrospective observational study of adult patients who experienced CPR at the emergency department of Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital from March 2013 to August 2014. All the performance of CPR were checked back by the record of "digital real-time video recording system". Average chest compression rate, actual chest compression rate, the percentage of hands-off period, time lag from patient arrival to chest compression, time lag from patient arrival to manual ventilation, time lag from patient arrival to first IV establish were compared. Causes of chest compression hands-off time were also studied.

results112 cases of resuscitation attempts were obtained. Average chest compression rate was over 100 compression per minute (cpm) in the majority of cases. However, indicators such as percentage of hands-off periods, time lag from patient arrival to the first manual ventilation and time lag from patient arrival to the first IV establish seemed to be worse in the manual CPR group compared to MCC CPR group. The saving of operators change time seemed to counteract the time spent on MCC equipment. Indicators such as percentage of hands-off periods, time lag between patient arrival to the first chest compression, time lag between patient arrival to the first manual ventilation and time lag from patient arrival to the first IV establish may influence the survival.

conclusionOur CPR quality remained to be improved. MCC may have a potentially positive role in CPR.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationChest Wall OscillationEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID26431420
PMCPMC4592189
OpenAlexW1779503447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.