Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26431331›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

18F-EF5 PET Is Predictive of Response to Fractionated Radiotherapy in Preclinical Tumor Models.

Rehan Ali, Sandeep Apte, Marta Vilalta, Murugesan Subbarayan, Zheng Miao, Frederick T Chin, Edward E Graves

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Synthesis of a 2-nitroimidazole derivative N-(4-[EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Hypoxia imaging withRadiation oncology (London, England) · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Molecular mechanisms of hypoxia in cancer.Clinical and translational imaging · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rehan AliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Sandeep ApteDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Marta VilaltaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Murugesan SubbarayanDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Zheng MiaoDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Frederick T ChinDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Edward E GravesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States of America.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Stanford Molecular Imaging Scholars - SMISR25CA118681 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LEVIN, CRAIG S · 2006 to 2015
$5.0M
Small Animal Image-Guided RadiotherapyR01CA131199 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GRAVES, EDWARD E. · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131199NCI NIH HHS R25 CA118681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the relationship between pre-treatment positron emission tomography (PET) using the hypoxic tracer 18F-[2-(2-nitro-1-H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3- pentafluoropropyl) acetamide] (18F-EF5) and the response of preclinical tumor models to a range of fractionated radiotherapies. Subcutaneous HT29, A549 and RKO tumors grown in nude mice were imaged using 18F-EF5 positron emission tomography (PET) in order to characterize the extent and heterogeneity of hypoxia in these systems. Based on these results, 80 A549 tumors were subsequently grown and imaged using 18F-EF5 PET, and then treated with one, two, or four fraction radiation treatments to a total dose of 10-40 Gy. Response was monitored by serial caliper measurements of tumor volume. Longitudinal post-treatment 18F-EF5 PET imaging was performed on a subset of tumors. Terminal histologic analysis was performed to validate 18F-EF5 PET measures of hypoxia. EF5-positive tumors responded more poorly to low dose single fraction irradiation relative to EF5-negative tumors, however both groups responded similarly to larger single fraction doses. Irradiated tumors exhibited reduced 18F-EF5 uptake one month after treatment compared to control tumors. These findings indicate that pre- treatment 18F-EF5 PET can predict the response of tumors to single fraction radiation treatment. However, increasing the number of fractions delivered abrogates the difference in response between tumors with high and low EF5 uptake pre-treatment, in agreement with traditional radiobiology.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnimalsCarcinomaCell HypoxiaCell Line, TumorDose Fractionation, RadiationEtanidazoleFluorine RadioisotopesFluorocarbonsHeterograftsHumansHydrocarbons, FluorinatedMaleMiceMice, NudeNeoplasms, Experimental2-(2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-N-(2,2,3,3,3-pentafluoropropyl)acetamideEtanidazoleFluorine RadioisotopesFluorocarbonsHydrocarbons, Fluorinated

Identifiers

PMID26431331
PMCPMC4592127
OpenAlexW2194049772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.