Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26430729›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2016

Tdap vaccine attitudes and utilization among pregnant women from a high-risk population.

Amanda F Dempsey, Sarah E Brewer, Carter Sevick, Jennifer Pyrzanowski, Sara Mazzoni, Sean T O'Leary

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Characterizing mothers and children at risk of being under-immunized in India: A latent class analysis approach.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda F Dempseya Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science Program (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Denver , Aurora , CO , USA.
Sarah E Brewera Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science Program (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Denver , Aurora , CO , USA.
Carter Sevicka Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science Program (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Denver , Aurora , CO , USA.
Jennifer Pyrzanowskia Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science Program (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Denver , Aurora , CO , USA.
Sara Mazzonib Obstetrics and Gynecology, Denver Health and Hospital Authority , Denver , CO , USA.
Sean T O'Learya Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science Program (ACCORDS), University of Colorado Denver , Aurora , CO , USA.
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

CDC HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infants infected with Bordatella pertussis experience high morbidity and significant mortality. Vaccinating pregnant mothers with the tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine is a recommended strategy for preventing infant pertussis. This is especially important for mothers living in poverty and from racial and ethnic minority populations as these groups are at increased risk of having a pertussis-affected infant. Using the Health Belief Model as a framework, we surveyed a convenience sample of pregnant mothers representing these high-risk populations to understand factors associated with Tdap vaccine uptake during their pregnancy. Among the 316 mothers surveyed, 82% had gotten or planned to get Tdap that same day even though 63% of the sample had concerns about the safety of the vaccine during pregnancy. Perceived benefits and norms were the Health Belief Model constructs most consistently associated with Tdap vaccination. Although 32% of women reported prior Tdap vaccine receipt, this factor was not associated with Tdap vaccination during the current pregnancy, contrasting studies of vaccination done in non-pregnant populations. Important variations in attitudes were apparent, with Spanish-speaking women significantly more likely to have concerns about the vaccine's safety and efficacy than English-speaking women. This study indicates that among this high-risk population acceptance of Tdap vaccine during pregnancy is high. However, our results suggest that it may be important to modify information conveyed about the safety and importance of Tdap during pregnancy based on individual level factors such as language or acculturation.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesAdolescentAdultDiphtheriaFemaleHumansInfantInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMothersPregnancyPregnant PeopleRacial GroupsRiskTetanusVaccinationDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinescocooningimmunizationpregnancyTetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine

Identifiers

PMID26430729
PMCPMC4962928
OpenAlexW1952134604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.