Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26430591›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2015

A Worldwide Analysis of the Reliability and Perceived Importance of an Injury to the Posterior Ligamentous Complex in AO Type A Fractures.

Gregory D Schroeder, Christopher K Kepler, John D Koerner, F Cumhur Oner, Michael G Fehlings, Bizhan Aarabi, Marcel F Dvorak, Max Reinhold, Frank Kandziora, Carlo Bellabarba and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. How reliable is the distinction between thoracolumbar AO type A3 and A4 fractures? A systematic literature review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Variation in global treatment for subaxial cervical spine isolated unilateral facet fractures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Thoracolumbar AOSpine Injury Score.Global spine journal · 2016
    Article
  17. The surgical algorithm for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gregory D SchroederDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Christopher K KeplerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
John D KoernerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
F Cumhur OnerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Michael G FehlingsDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bizhan AarabiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Marcel F DvorakDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Max ReinholdDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Suedstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Frank KandzioraBerufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Carlo BellabarbaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Washington/Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Jens R ChapmanSwedish Neuroscience Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Luiz R VialleDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Catholic University, Curitiba, Brazil.
Alexander R VaccaroDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Design Survey of spine surgeons. Objective To determine the reliability with which international spine surgeons identify a posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury in a patient with a compression-type vertebral body fracture (type A). Methods A survey was sent to all AOSpine members from the six AO regions of the world. The survey consisted of 10 cases of type A fractures (2 subtype A1, 2 subtype A2, 3 subtype A3, and 3 subtype A4 fractures) with appropriate imaging (plain radiographs, computed tomography, and/or magnetic resonance imaging), and the respondent was asked to identify fractures with a PLC disruption, as well as to indicate if the integrity of the PLC would affect their treatment recommendation. Results Five hundred twenty-nine spine surgeons from all six AO regions of the world completed the survey. The overall interobserver reliability in determining the integrity of the PLC was slight (kappa = 0.11). No substantial regional or experiential difference was identified in determining PLC integrity or its absence; however, a regional difference was identified (p < 0.001) in how PLC integrity influenced the treatment of type A fractures. Conclusion The results of this survey indicate that there is only slight international reliability in determining the integrity of the PLC in type A fractures. Although the biomechanical importance of the PLC is not in doubt, the inability to reliably determine the integrity of the PLC may limit the utility of the M1 modifier in the AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.

Indexed as

AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification SystemM1 modifierPLCposterior ligamentous complexreliability

Identifiers

PMID26430591
PMCPMC4577328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.