Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26430551›Full record

ArticleWorm

Microtubule dynamics followed through cell differentiation and tissue biogenesis in C. elegans.

Benjamin Lacroix, Amy S Maddox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Worm. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benjamin LacroixInstitut Jacques Monod; CNRS; University Paris Diderot ; Paris, France.
Amy S MaddoxDepartment of Biology; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill ; Chapel Hill, NC USA.

Funding

Super-resolution of the Mechanisms of Cell Shape Change in Cytokinesis - the Zeiss LSM800/AiryscanR01GM102390 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MADDOX, AMY SHAUB · 2012 to 2020
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microtubules (MTs) are cytoskeletal filaments essential for many processes in eukaryotic cells. Assembled of tubulin subunits, MTs are dynamic structures that undergo successive and stochastic phases of polymerization and depolymerization, a behavior called dynamic instability. Dynamic instability has been extensively studied in cultured cells and in vitro using cytoplasmic extracts or reconstituted MTs. However, how MTs behave in intact tissues and how their dynamics are affected by or affect tissue function are poorly understood. Recent advances in high-resolution live imaging have helped overcome technical limitation in order to visualize MTs in intact living organisms including Drosophila or Caenorhabditis elegans. We recently took advantage of the well-characterized development, small size and transparency of C. elegans to monitor MT dynamics throughout tissue biogenesis with high spatial and temporal resolution. Using the sex myoblast lineage that generates the egg-laying muscles from 2 mitotic precursors, we identified selective dynamics in precursor versus differentiated cells, and molecular regulation of MT dynamics changes that occur during cell differentiation. We discuss here how this approach led to novel insights into the regulation of MTs dynamics and organization in vivo.

Indexed as

cell differentiationcytoskeletonhigh-resolution live imagingmicrotubule differentiationmicrotubule dynamicstissue biogenesis

Identifiers

PMID26430551
PMCPMC4588219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.