ArticleGenome research2015
Half dozen of one, six billion of the other: What can small- and large-scale molecular systems biology learn from one another?
Article in Genome research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of and gene regulatory constraints on transcriptional adaptation in single cells.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Prevalence of and gene regulatory constraints on transcriptional adaptation in single cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Systematically quantifying morphological features reveals constraints on organoid phenotypes.Cell systems · 2022Article
- Spatial transcriptomics using combinatorial fluorescence spectral and lifetime encoding, imaging and analysis.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Responsiveness to perturbations is a hallmark of transcription factors that maintain cell identity in vitro.Cell systems · 2021Article
- Functional Annotations of Paralogs: A Blessing and a Curse.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Switch-like Transitions Insulate Network Motifs to Modularize Biological Networks.Cell systems · 2016Article
- What's Luck Got to Do with It: Single Cells, Multiple Fates, and Biological Nondeterminism.Molecular cell · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Small-scale molecular systems biology, by which we mean the understanding of a how a few parts work together to control a particular biological process, is predicated on the assumption that cellular regulation is arranged in a circuit-like structure. Results from the omics revolution have upset this vision to varying degrees by revealing a high degree of interconnectivity, making it difficult to develop a simple, circuit-like understanding of regulatory processes. We here outline the limitations of the small-scale systems biology approach with examples from research into genetic algorithms, genetics, transcriptional network analysis, and genomics. We also discuss the difficulties associated with deriving true understanding from the analysis of large data sets and propose that the development of new, intelligent, computational tools may point to a way forward. Throughout, we intentionally oversimplify and talk about things in which we have little expertise, and it is likely that many of our arguments are wrong on one level or another. We do believe, however, that developing a true understanding via molecular systems biology will require a fundamental rethinking of our approach, and our goal is to provoke thought along these lines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.