Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26430118›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2015

Multiple repressive mechanisms in the hippocampus during memory formation.

Jun Cho, Nam-Kyung Yu, Jun-Hyeok Choi, Su-Eon Sim, SukJae Joshua Kang, Chuljung Kwak, Seung-Woo Lee, Ji-il Kim, Dong Il Choi, V Narry Kim and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun ChoCenter for RNA Research, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul 151-742, Korea. Department of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea.
Nam-Kyung YuDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea.
Jun-Hyeok ChoiDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea.
Su-Eon SimDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea.
SukJae Joshua KangDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea.
Chuljung KwakDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea.
Seung-Woo LeeDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea.
Ji-il KimDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea.
Dong Il ChoiDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea.
V Narry KimCenter for RNA Research, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul 151-742, Korea. Department of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea. narrykim@snu.ac.kr kaang@snu.ac.kr.
Bong-Kiun KaangDepartment of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, Korea. narrykim@snu.ac.kr kaang@snu.ac.kr.
Seoul National University · KRInstitute for Basic Science · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory stabilization after learning requires translational and transcriptional regulations in the brain, yet the temporal molecular changes that occur after learning have not been explored at the genomic scale. We used ribosome profiling and RNA sequencing to quantify the translational status and transcript levels in the mouse hippocampus after contextual fear conditioning. We revealed three types of repressive regulations: translational suppression of ribosomal protein-coding genes in the hippocampus, learning-induced early translational repression of specific genes, and late persistent suppression of a subset of genes via inhibition of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1/ERα) signaling. In behavioral analyses, overexpressing Nrsn1, one of the newly identified genes undergoing rapid translational repression, or activating ESR1 in the hippocampus impaired memory formation. Collectively, this study unveils the yet-unappreciated importance of gene repression mechanisms for memory formation.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationMemoryAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalEstrogen Receptor alphaFearHippocampusMaleMembrane ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLProtein BiosynthesisRibosomal ProteinsTranscription, GeneticEstrogen Receptor alphaMembrane ProteinsNrsn1 protein, mouseRibosomal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26430118
OpenAlexW2261298189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.