ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015
Recombining without Hotspots: A Comprehensive Evolutionary Portrait of Recombination in Two Closely Related Species of Drosophila.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.
- Why recombination hotspots?PLoS genetics · 2026Review
- A high-resolution crossover landscape in Drosophila santomea reveals rapid and concerted evolution of multiple properties of crossing over control.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Evolution of GC-biased gene conversion by natural selection.Genetics · 2025Article
- Unexpectedly low recombination rates and presence of hotspots in termite genomes.Genome research · 2025Article
- High-recombining genomic regions affect demography inference based on ancestral recombination graphs.Genetics · 2025Article
- The recombination landscape of introgression in yeast.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Article
- The recombination landscape of introgression in yeast.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Understanding the Genetic Basis of Variation in Meiotic Recombination: Past, Present, and Future.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Review
- Down the Penrose stairs, or how selection for fewer recombination hotspots maintains their existence.eLife · 2023Article
- Variation in mutation, recombination, and transposition rates inGenome research · 2023Article
- The Linkage-Disequilibrium and Recombinational Landscape in Daphnia pulex.Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Gene flow biases population genetic inference of recombination rate.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Variation in fine-scale recombination rate in temperature-evolved Drosophila melanogaster populations in response to selection.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Background selection under evolving recombination rates.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Patterns and Causes of Signed Linkage Disequilibria in Flies and Plants.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Predicting future from past: The genomic basis of recurrent and rapid stickleback evolution.Science advances · 2021Article
- Adaptation of Drosophila subobscura chromosomal inversions to climatic variables: the Balkan natural population of Avala.Genetica · 2021Article
- Adaptation of codon and amino acid use for translational functions in highly expressed cricket genes.BMC genomics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meiotic recombination rate varies across the genome within and between individuals, populations, and species in virtually all taxa studied. In almost every species, this variation takes the form of discrete recombination hotspots, determined in some mammals by a protein called PRDM9. Hotspots and their determinants have a profound effect on the genomic landscape, and share certain features that extend across the tree of life. Drosophila, in contrast, are anomalous in their absence of hotspots, PRDM9, and other species-specific differences in the determination of recombination. To better understand the evolution of meiosis and general patterns of recombination across diverse taxa, we present a truly comprehensive portrait of recombination across time, combining recently published cross-based contemporary recombination estimates from each of two sister species with newly obtained linkage-disequilibrium-based historic estimates of recombination from both of these species. Using Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila miranda as a model system, we compare recombination rate between species at multiple scales, and we suggest that Drosophila replicate the pattern seen in human-chimpanzee in which recombination rate is conserved at broad scales. We also find evidence of a species-wide recombination modifier(s), resulting in both a present and historic genome-wide elevation of recombination rates in D. miranda, and identify broad scale effects on recombination from the presence of an inversion. Finally, we reveal an unprecedented view of the distribution of recombination in D. pseudoobscura, illustrating patterns of linked selection and where recombination is taking place. Overall, by combining these estimation approaches, we highlight key similarities and differences in recombination between Drosophila and other organisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.