Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26430061›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015

Expression Divergence of Chemosensory Genes between Drosophila sechellia and Its Sibling Species and Its Implications for Host Shift.

Meng-Shin Shiao, Jia-Ming Chang, Wen-Lang Fan, Mei-Yeh Jade Lu, Cedric Notredame, Shu Fang, Rumi Kondo, Wen-Hsiung Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Sex-biased expression is associated with chromatin state inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Evolution of olfactory circuits in insects.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Scent of the Fly.Journal of chemical ecology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meng-Shin ShiaoBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan Research Center, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jia-Ming ChangCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain Institute of Human Genetics (IGH), UPR 1142, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
Wen-Lang FanBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan Whole-Genome Research Core Laboratory of Human Diseases, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Mei-Yeh Jade LuBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cedric NotredameCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Shu FangBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Rumi KondoGraduate School of Humanities and Sciences, Ochanomizu University, Tokyo, Japan kondo.rumi@ocha.ac.jp whli@sinica.edu.tw.
Wen-Hsiung LiBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago kondo.rumi@ocha.ac.jp whli@sinica.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila sechellia relies exclusively on the fruits of Morinda citrifolia, which are toxic to most insects, including its sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Although several odorant binding protein (Obp) genes and olfactory receptor (Or) genes have been suggested to be associated with the D. sechellia host shift, a broad view of how chemosensory genes have contributed to this shift is still lacking. We therefore studied the transcriptomes of antennae, the main organ responsible for detecting food resource and oviposition, of D. sechellia and its two sibling species. We wanted to know whether gene expression, particularly chemosensory genes, has diverged between D. sechellia and its two sibling species. Using a very stringent definition of differential gene expression, we found a higher percentage of chemosensory genes differentially expressed in the D. sechellia lineage (7.8%) than in the D. simulans lineage (5.4%); for upregulated chemosensory genes, the percentages were 8.8% in D. sechellia and 5.2% in D. simulans. Interestingly, Obp50a exhibited the highest upregulation, an approximately 100-fold increase, and Or85c--previously reported to be a larva-specific gene--showed approximately 20-fold upregulation in D. sechellia. Furthermore, Ir84a (ionotropic receptor 84a), which has been proposed to be associated with male courtship behavior, was significantly upregulated in D. sechellia. We also found expression divergence in most of the chemosensory gene families between D. sechellia and the two sibling species. Our observations suggest that the host shift of D. sechellia was associated with the enrichment of differentially expressed, particularly upregulated, chemosensory genes.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalAnimalsArthropod AntennaeBase SequenceDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleFruitGene Expression RegulationGenes, InsectMaleMolecular Sequence DataMorindaPlant Physiological PhenomenaReceptors, OdorantDrosophila Proteinsodorant-binding proteinReceptors, OdorantRNAantennal transcriptomechemosensory genesDrosophila sechelliahost shiftRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID26430061
PMCPMC4684695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.