ArticleGenome biology and evolution2015
Expression Divergence of Chemosensory Genes between Drosophila sechellia and Its Sibling Species and Its Implications for Host Shift.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive Evolution of Odorant-Binding and Chemosensory Protein Gene Families in GenusBiomolecules · 2026Article
- Evolution of chemosensory tissues and cells across ecologically diverse Drosophilids.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Lampshade web spider Ectatosticta davidi chromosome-level genome assembly provides evidence for its phylogenetic position.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Estimating transcriptome complexities across eukaryotes.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Sex-Biased Expression Is Associated With Chromatin State in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Sex-biased expression is associated with chromatin state inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Placing human gene families into their evolutionary context.Human genomics · 2022Review
- Parallel evolution of a splicing program controlling neuronal excitability in flies and mammals.Science advances · 2022Article
- Molecular and behavioral studies reveal differences in olfaction between winter and summer morphs ofPeerJ · 2022Article
- Article
- Olfactory Receptor Gene Regulation in Insects: Multiple Mechanisms for Singular Expression.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- Genomic content of chemosensory receptors in two sister blister beetles facilitates characterization of chemosensory evolution.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Evolution of olfactory circuits in insects.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020Review
- Article
- Review
- Evolution of Reproductive Behavior.Genetics · 2020Review
- Genomic analysis of the four ecologically distinct cactus host populations of Drosophila mojavensis.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- The Scent of the Fly.Journal of chemical ecology · 2018Article
- Supervised machine learning reveals introgressed loci in the genomes of Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Antennal Protein Profile in Honeybees: Caste and Task Matter More Than Age.Frontiers in physiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drosophila sechellia relies exclusively on the fruits of Morinda citrifolia, which are toxic to most insects, including its sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Although several odorant binding protein (Obp) genes and olfactory receptor (Or) genes have been suggested to be associated with the D. sechellia host shift, a broad view of how chemosensory genes have contributed to this shift is still lacking. We therefore studied the transcriptomes of antennae, the main organ responsible for detecting food resource and oviposition, of D. sechellia and its two sibling species. We wanted to know whether gene expression, particularly chemosensory genes, has diverged between D. sechellia and its two sibling species. Using a very stringent definition of differential gene expression, we found a higher percentage of chemosensory genes differentially expressed in the D. sechellia lineage (7.8%) than in the D. simulans lineage (5.4%); for upregulated chemosensory genes, the percentages were 8.8% in D. sechellia and 5.2% in D. simulans. Interestingly, Obp50a exhibited the highest upregulation, an approximately 100-fold increase, and Or85c--previously reported to be a larva-specific gene--showed approximately 20-fold upregulation in D. sechellia. Furthermore, Ir84a (ionotropic receptor 84a), which has been proposed to be associated with male courtship behavior, was significantly upregulated in D. sechellia. We also found expression divergence in most of the chemosensory gene families between D. sechellia and the two sibling species. Our observations suggest that the host shift of D. sechellia was associated with the enrichment of differentially expressed, particularly upregulated, chemosensory genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.