ArticleOncotarget2015
Genomic landscape of endometrial stromal sarcoma of uterus.
Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinicopathological Predictors of Recurrence in Uterine Sarcomas-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Multidisciplinary management of intracardiac tumor thrombus in low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Detection of driver mutations and genomic signatures in endometrial cancers using artificial intelligence algorithms.PloS one · 2024Article
- Genomic and Transcriptomic Characterization Revealed the High Sensitivity of Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in a Subset of Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma.Cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
- Mechanical instability generated by Myosin 19 contributes to mitochondria cristae architecture and OXPHOS.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Article
- LG-ESSs and HG-ESSs: underlying molecular alterations and potential therapeutic strategies.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2021Review
- The mutational repertoire of uterine sarcomas and carcinosarcomas in a Brazilian cohort: A preliminary study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2021Article
- Review
- Macrophage infiltration and genetic landscape of undifferentiated uterine sarcomas.JCI insight · 2017Article
- PRKAR1A is a functional tumor suppressor inhibiting ERK/Snail/E-cadherin pathway in lung adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Mutational burdens and evolutionary ages of thyroid follicular adenoma are comparable to those of follicular carcinoma.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- JAZF1/SUZ12 gene fusion in endometrial stromal sarcomas.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2016Review
- High EZH2 expression is correlated to metastatic disease in pediatric soft tissue sarcomas.Cancer cell international · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although recurrent gene fusions such as JAZF1-JJAZ1 are considered driver events for endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) development, other genomic alterations remain largely unknown. In this study, we performed whole-exome sequencing, transcriptome sequencing and copy number profiling for five ESSs (three low-grade ESS (LG-ESS) and two undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (UUSs)). All three LG-ESSs exhibited either one of JAZF1-SUZ12, JAZF1-PHF1 and MEAF6-PHF1 fusions, whereas the two UUSs did not. All ESSs except one LG-ESS exhibited copy number alterations (CNAs), many of which encompassed cancer-related genes. In UUSs, five CNAs encompassing cancer-related genes (EZR, CDH1, RB1, TP53 and PRKAR1A) accompanied their expressional changes, suggesting that they might stimulate UUS development. We found 81 non-silent mutations (35 from LG-ESSs and 46 from UUSs) that included 15 putative cancer genes catalogued in cancer-related databases, including PPARG and IRF4 mutations. However, they were non-recurrent and did not include any well-known mutations, indicating that point mutations may not be a major driver for ESS development. Our data show that gene fusions and CNAs are the principal drivers for LG-ESS and USS, respectively, but both may require additional genomic alterations including point mutations. These differences may explain the different biologic behaviors between LG-ESS and UUS. Our findings suggest that ESS development requires point mutations and CNAs as well as the gene fusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.