Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26429873›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Genomic landscape of endometrial stromal sarcoma of uterus.

Youn Jin Choi, Seung-Hyun Jung, Min Sung Kim, In-Pyo Baek, Jae-Keun Rhee, Sung Hak Lee, Soo Young Hur, Tae-Min Kim, Yeun-Jun Chung, Sug Hyung Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. JAZF1/SUZ12 gene fusion in endometrial stromal sarcomas.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Youn Jin ChoiDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Hyun JungDepartment of Cancer Evolution Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Min Sung KimDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
In-Pyo BaekDepartment of Cancer Evolution Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Keun RheeDepartment of Medical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Sung Hak LeeDepartment of Hospital Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Soo Young HurDepartment of Obstetrics/Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Min KimDepartment of Medical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Yeun-Jun ChungDepartment of Cancer Evolution Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.
Sug Hyung LeeDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although recurrent gene fusions such as JAZF1-JJAZ1 are considered driver events for endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) development, other genomic alterations remain largely unknown. In this study, we performed whole-exome sequencing, transcriptome sequencing and copy number profiling for five ESSs (three low-grade ESS (LG-ESS) and two undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (UUSs)). All three LG-ESSs exhibited either one of JAZF1-SUZ12, JAZF1-PHF1 and MEAF6-PHF1 fusions, whereas the two UUSs did not. All ESSs except one LG-ESS exhibited copy number alterations (CNAs), many of which encompassed cancer-related genes. In UUSs, five CNAs encompassing cancer-related genes (EZR, CDH1, RB1, TP53 and PRKAR1A) accompanied their expressional changes, suggesting that they might stimulate UUS development. We found 81 non-silent mutations (35 from LG-ESSs and 46 from UUSs) that included 15 putative cancer genes catalogued in cancer-related databases, including PPARG and IRF4 mutations. However, they were non-recurrent and did not include any well-known mutations, indicating that point mutations may not be a major driver for ESS development. Our data show that gene fusions and CNAs are the principal drivers for LG-ESS and USS, respectively, but both may require additional genomic alterations including point mutations. These differences may explain the different biologic behaviors between LG-ESS and UUS. Our findings suggest that ESS development requires point mutations and CNAs as well as the gene fusions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesDNA Copy Number VariationsEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedOncogene Proteins, FusionSarcoma, Endometrial StromalOncogene Proteins, Fusioncopy numberendometrial stromal sarcomagenomemutationwhole exome

Identifiers

PMID26429873
PMCPMC4741768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.