Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26429791›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2016

Emotional traits predict individual differences in amphetamine-induced positive mood in healthy volunteers.

Matthew G Kirkpatrick, Nicholas I Goldenson, Nahel Kapadia, Christopher W Kahler, Harriet de Wit, Robert M Swift, John E McGeary, Steve Sussman, Adam M Leventhal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew G KirkpatrickDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto St., Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA. mgkirkpa@usc.edu.
Nicholas I GoldensonDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto St., Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
Nahel KapadiaDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto St., Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
Christopher W KahlerCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Robert M SwiftCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
John E McGearyCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Steve SussmanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto St., Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
Adam M LeventhalDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2001 N. Soto St., Room 302B, Los Angeles, CA, 90032, USA.
University of Southern California · USBrown University · USJohn Brown University · USProvidence VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
Affective and Genetic Correlates of Amphetamine ResponseK08DA025041 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI LEVENTHAL, ADAM MATTHEW · 2009 to 2013
$773k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430NIDA NIH HHS K08 DA025041NIDA NIH HHS K08-DA025041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious research on emotional correlates of individual differences in subjective responses to D-amphetamine has focused on relatively broad personality traits. Yet, emotional functioning is best characterized by several narrow subcomponents, each of which may contribute uniquely to amphetamine response. Here, we examine several specific subdomains of emotional functioning in relation to acute amphetamine response.

methodAt a baseline session, healthy stimulant-naive volunteers (N = 97) completed measures of several subdomains of baseline trait emotional functioning and then completed two counterbalanced experimental sessions during which they received a single oral dose of 20 mg D-amphetamine or placebo. Acute subjective drug response measures were completed at repeated intervals before and after drug administration. Data from subjective measures that were significantly modulated by amphetamine were reduced using principal component analysis (amphetamine or placebo) into three higher-order factors of "positive mood," "arousal," and "drug high." Amphetamine did not significantly alter any "negative" subjective states. Separate multiple regression analyses were conducted regressing these three drug factors on baseline trait emotional functioning scales.

resultsThe combined set of trait emotional functioning indicators accounted for approximately 22 % of the variance in acute amphetamine-induced positive mood changes. Greater anticipatory pleasure and greater anxious distress each uniquely predicted greater amphetamine-induced positive mood. Trait emotional functioning did not significantly predict amphetamine-induced changes in arousal or drug high. DISCUSSION: Emotional traits appear to moderate drug-induced positive mood but not other dimensions of amphetamine effects. Different facets of emotional functioning may differentially modulate amphetamine's subjective effect profile.

Indexed as

Healthy VolunteersIndividualityAdultAffectAmphetamineAnxietyArousalCentral Nervous System StimulantsDextroamphetamineEmotionsFemaleHumansMalePredictive Value of TestsYoung AdultAmphetamineCentral Nervous System StimulantsDextroamphetamineAmphetamineEmotionHumanSubjective effects

Identifiers

PMID26429791
PMCPMC4703469
OpenAlexW1815724028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.