Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26429064›Full record

ReviewDNA repair2015

Chromatin dynamics after DNA damage: The legacy of the access-repair-restore model.

Sophie E Polo, Geneviève Almouzni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DNA repair, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. DNA Repair in Nucleosomes: Insights from Histone Modifications and Mutants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. UV-B-induced modulation of constitutive heterochromatin content in Arabidopsis thaliana.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sophie E PoloEpigenome Integrity group, UMR 7216 CNRS, Paris Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 35 rue Hélène Brion, 75205 Paris cedex 13, France. Electronic address: sophie.polo@univ-paris-diderot.fr.
Geneviève AlmouzniChromatin Dynamics group, UMR 3664 CNRS, Institut Curie Research Center, PSL Research University, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris cedex 05, France. Electronic address: genevieve.almouzni@curie.fr.

Funding

European Research Council 336427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic genomes are packaged into chromatin, which is the physiological substrate for all DNA transactions, including DNA damage and repair. Chromatin organization imposes major constraints on DNA damage repair and thus undergoes critical rearrangements during the repair process. These rearrangements have been integrated into the "access-repair-restore" (ARR) model, which provides a molecular framework for chromatin dynamics in response to DNA damage. Here, we take a historical perspective on the elaboration of this model and describe the molecular players involved in damaged chromatin reorganization in human cells. In particular, we present our current knowledge of chromatin assembly coupled to DNA damage repair, focusing on the role of histone variants and their dedicated chaperones. Finally, we discuss the impact of chromatin rearrangements after DNA damage on chromatin function and epigenome maintenance.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsDNAEukaryotaHistonesHumansMolecular ChaperonesDNAHistonesMolecular ChaperonesChromatin assemblyDNA damage repairEpigenome maintenanceHistone chaperonesHistone variants

Identifiers

PMID26429064
PMCPMC5113751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.