Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26428894›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Associations between parental rules, style of communication and children's screen time.

Mona Bjelland, Bart Soenens, Elling Bere, Éva Kovács, Nanna Lien, Lea Maes, Yannis Manios, George Moschonis, Saskia J te Velde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mona BjellandDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1046 Blindern, NO-0316, Oslo, Norway. mona.bjelland@medisin.uio.no.
Bart SoenensDepartment of Developmental, Personality and Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Bart.Soenens@UGent.be.
Elling BereDepartment of Public Health, Sport and Nutrition; Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway. elling.bere@uia.no.
Éva KovácsDepartment of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary. e.k.kovacs@gmail.com.
Nanna LienDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1046 Blindern, NO-0316, Oslo, Norway. nanna.lien@medisin.uio.no.
Lea MaesDepartment of Public Health, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Lea.Maes@UGent.be.
Yannis ManiosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece. manios@hua.gr.
George MoschonisDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University, Athens, Greece. gmoschi@hua.gr.
Saskia J te VeldeDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health & Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.tevelde@vumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch suggests an inverse association between parental rules and screen time in pre-adolescents, and that parents' style of communication with their children is related to the children's time spent watching TV. The aims of this study were to examine associations of parental rules and parental style of communication with children's screen time and perceived excessive screen time in five European countries.

methodsUP4FUN was a multi-centre, cluster randomised controlled trial with pre- and post-test measurements in each of five countries; Belgium, Germany, Greece, Hungary and Norway. Questionnaires were completed by the children at school and the parent questionnaire was brought home. Three structural equation models were tested based on measures of screen time and parental style of communication from the pre-test questionnaires. DISCUSSION: Of the 152 schools invited, 62 (41 %) schools agreed to participate. In total 3325 children (average age 11.2 years and 51 % girls) and 3038 parents (81 % mothers) completed the pre-test questionnaire. The average TV/DVD times across the countries were between 1.5 and 1.8 h/day, while less time was used for computer/games console (0.9-1.4 h/day). The children's perceived parental style of communication was quite consistent for TV/DVD and computer/games console. The presence of rules was significantly associated with less time watching TV/DVD and use of computer/games console time. Moreover, the use of an autonomy-supportive style was negatively related to both time watching TV/DVD and use of computer/games console time. The use of a controlling style was related positively to perceived excessive time used on TV/DVD and excessive time used on computer/games console. With a few exceptions, results were similar across the five countries.

conclusionsThis study suggests that an autonomy-supportive style of communicating rules for TV/DVD or computer/ games console use is negatively related to children's time watching TV/DVD and use of computer/games console time. In contrast, a controlling style is associated with more screen time and with more perceived excessive screen time in particular. Longitudinal research is needed to further examine effects of parental style of communication on children's screen time as well as possible reciprocal effects.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Register, registration number: ISRCTN34562078 . Date applied29/07/2011, Date assigned11/10/2011.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorCommunicationComputersParentingParentsTelevisionVideo GamesChildEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMothersParent-Child RelationsPerceptionSchools

Identifiers

PMID26428894
PMCPMC4589944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.