Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26428891›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH2015

An in situ hybridization study of perlecan, DMP1, and MEPE in developing condylar cartilage of the fetal mouse mandible and limb bud cartilage.

K Fujikawa, T Yokohama-Tamaki, T Morita, O Baba, C Qin, S Shibata

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of histochemistry : EJH, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Divergent Expression ofFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Histochemistry today: Detection and location of single molecules.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Is there still room for novelty, in histochemical papers?European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2016
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

K FujikawaTokyo Medical and Dental University. krfwmfa@tmd.ac.jp.
T Yokohama-Tamaki
T Morita
O Baba
C Qin
S Shibata
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JPMitchell Institute · USOhu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main purpose of this in situ hybridization study was to investigate mRNA expression of three bone/cartilage matrix components (perlecan, DMP1, and MEPE) in developing primary (tibial) and secondary (condylar) cartilage. Perlecan mRNA expression was first detected in newly formed chondrocytes in tibial cartilage at E13.0, but this expression decreased in hypertrophic chondrocytes at E14.0. In contrast, at E15.0, perlecan mRNA was first detected in the newly formed chondrocytes of condylar cartilage; these chondrocytes had characteristics of hypertrophic chondrocytes, which confirmed the previous observation that progenitor cells of developing secondary cartilage rapidly differentiate into hypertrophic chondrocytes. DMP1 mRNA was detected in many chondrocytes within the lower hypertrophic cell zone in tibial cartilage at E14.0. In contrast, DMP1 mRNA expression was only transiently detected in a few chondrocytes of condylar cartilage at E15.0. Thus, DMP1 may be less important in the developing condylar cartilage than in the tibial cartilage. Another purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that MEPE may be a useful marker molecule for cartilage. MEPE mRNA was not detected in any chondrocytes in either tibial or condylar cartilage; however, MEPE immunoreactivity was detected throughout the cartilage matrix. Western immunoblot analysis demonstrated that MEPE antibody recognized two bands, one of 67 kDa and another of 59 kDa, in cartilage-derived samples. Thus MEPE protein may gradually accumulate in the cartilage, even though mRNA expression levels were below the limits of detection of in situ hybridization. Ultimately, we could not designate MEPE as a marker molecule for cartilage, and would modify our original hypothesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCartilageExtracellular Matrix ProteinsFetusGlycoproteinsHeparan Sulfate ProteoglycansIn Situ HybridizationLimb BudsMandibular CondyleMiceMice, Inbred ICRPhosphoproteinsDmp1 protein, mouseExtracellular Matrix ProteinsGlycoproteinsHeparan Sulfate ProteoglycansMepe protein, mouseperlecanPhosphoproteins

Identifiers

PMID26428891
PMCPMC4598603
OpenAlexW2156154414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.