ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2015
Methods to calibrate the absolute receive sensitivity of single-element, focused transducers.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in bubble-cloud dissolution throughout the application of histotripsy pulses.Physical review applied · 2025Article
- Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Review
- Cavitation Emissions Nucleated by Definity Infused through an EkoSonic Catheter in a Flow Phantom.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2021Article
- In vitro assessment of stiffness-dependent histotripsy bubble cloud activity in gel phantoms and blood clots.Physics in medicine and biology · 2019Article
- For Whom the Bubble Grows: Physical Principles of Bubble Nucleation and Dynamics in Histotripsy Ultrasound Therapy.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2019Review
- Characterization of cavitation-radiated acoustic power using diffraction correction.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2018Article
- Post Hoc Analysis of Passive Cavitation Imaging for Classification of Histotripsy-Induced Liquefaction in Vitro.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2018Article
- Quantitative Frequency-Domain Passive Cavitation Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2017Article
- Accuracy of a bistatic scattering substitution technique for calibration of focused receivers.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Absolute pressure measurements of acoustic emissions by single-element, focused passive cavitation detectors would be facilitated by improved wideband receive calibration techniques. Here, calibration methods were developed to characterize the absolute, frequency-dependent receive sensitivity of a spherically focused, single-element transducer using pulse-echo and pitch-catch techniques. Validation of these calibration methods on a focused receiver were made by generating a pulse from a small diameter source at the focus of the transducer and comparing the absolute pressure measured by a calibrated hydrophone to that of the focused transducer using the receive sensitivities determined here.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.