Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26428802›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2015

Functional modeling of the human auditory brainstem response to broadband stimulation.

Sarah Verhulst, Hari M Bharadwaj, Golbarg Mehraei, Christopher A Shera, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Single Neuron Contributions to the Auditory Brainstem EEG.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Computational modeling of the human compound action potential.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Speech Categorization Reveals the Role of Early-Stage Temporal-Coherence Processing in Auditory Scene Analysis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  9. A comparative study of eight human auditory models of monaural processing.Acta acustica. European Acoustics Association · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah VerhulstCluster of Excellence "Hearing4all" and Medizinische Physik, Department of Medical Physics and Acoustics, Oldenburg University, Carl-von-Ossietzky Strasse 9-11, 26129 Oldenburg, Germany.
Hari M BharadwajCenter of Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Golbarg MehraeiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Christopher A SheraEaton-Peabody Laboratory, 243 Charles Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
Barbara G Shinn-CunninghamCenter of Computational Neuroscience and Neural Technology, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Boston University · USEaton (United States) · USHearing4all · DE

Funding

TRAINING FOR SPEECH AND HEARING SCIENCEST32DC000038 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Gwenaelle S Geleoc · 1992 to 2026
$21.8M
UNDERSTANDING OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONSR01DC003687 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christopher A Shera · 1999 to 2026
$9.8M
Individual differences in supra-threshold sound encodingR01DC013825 · NIDCD · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI SHINN-CUNNINGHAM, BARBARA · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003687NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013825NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000038NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC00038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population responses such as the auditory brainstem response (ABR) are commonly used for hearing screening, but the relationship between single-unit physiology and scalp-recorded population responses are not well understood. Computational models that integrate physiologically realistic models of single-unit auditory-nerve (AN), cochlear nucleus (CN) and inferior colliculus (IC) cells with models of broadband peripheral excitation can be used to simulate ABRs and thereby link detailed knowledge of animal physiology to human applications. Existing functional ABR models fail to capture the empirically observed 1.2-2 ms ABR wave-V latency-vs-intensity decrease that is thought to arise from level-dependent changes in cochlear excitation and firing synchrony across different tonotopic sections. This paper proposes an approach where level-dependent cochlear excitation patterns, which reflect human cochlear filter tuning parameters, drive AN fibers to yield realistic level-dependent properties of the ABR wave-V. The number of free model parameters is minimal, producing a model in which various sources of hearing-impairment can easily be simulated on an individualized and frequency-dependent basis. The model fits latency-vs-intensity functions observed in human ABRs and otoacoustic emissions while maintaining rate-level and threshold characteristics of single-unit AN fibers. The simulations help to reveal which tonotopic regions dominate ABR waveform peaks at different stimulus intensities.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationBasilar MembraneBiobehavioral SciencesBrain StemCochleaCochlear NerveEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHearingHumansOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousReaction TimeVibration

Identifiers

PMID26428802
PMCPMC4592442
OpenAlexW2221094168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.