Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26428675›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2016

Bioimpedance analysis versus lung ultrasonography for optimal risk prediction in hemodialysis patients.

Dimitrie Siriopol, Luminita Voroneanu, Simona Hogas, Mugurel Apetrii, Angelica Gramaticu, Raluca Dumea, Alexandru Burlacu, Radu Sascau, Mehmet Kanbay, Adrian Covic

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Recommendations for Lung Ultrasound in Internal Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Volume Assessment in Patients Undergoing Long-Term Dialysis.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Volume overload in hemodialysis: diagnosis, cardiovascular consequences, and management.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Review
  11. Progress in volume assessment for the hemodialysis patients.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dimitrie SiriopolUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr.T.Popa", Iasi, Romania.
Luminita VoroneanuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr.T.Popa", Iasi, Romania.
Simona HogasUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr.T.Popa", Iasi, Romania.
Mugurel ApetriiUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr.T.Popa", Iasi, Romania.
Angelica GramaticuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr.T.Popa", Iasi, Romania.
Raluca DumeaUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr.T.Popa", Iasi, Romania.
Alexandru BurlacuUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr.T.Popa", Iasi, Romania.
Radu SascauUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr.T.Popa", Iasi, Romania.
Mehmet KanbayDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Adrian CovicUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy "Gr.T.Popa", Iasi, Romania. accovic@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluid overload is associated with adverse outcomes in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Two bedside methods are increasingly utilized to evaluate objectively fluid status-bioimpedance and lung ultrasonography, but there is no available direct, head-to-head comparison of their prognostic significance. Importantly, their predictive abilities have never been tested in a HD population, alongside those of a classic model that also incorporates established echocardiographic parameters of increased mortality risk. Between 26 May 2011 and 26 October 2012, we included in the study 173 patients undergoing chronic HD treatment for at least 3 months in a single dialysis unit. Relative fluid overload (RFO) and B-lines score (BLS) were used as candidate predictors. From Cox survival analysis we evaluated the increase in the predictive abilities for all-cause mortality of adding continuous RFO or BLS to a model including conventional predictors . 31 patients (17.9 %) died during a median follow-up of 21.3 (interquartile range 19.9-30.3) months. All Cox models showed good calibration. The C statistic for the all-cause mortality prediction increased significantly when the RFO was included into the baseline model (ΔC statistics 0.058 95 %CI = 0.003-0.114), but not when the BLS was included into the baseline model. Only the model that incorporated RFO showed significantly better risk reclassification abilities than the baseline model (IDI = 3.6 % and continuous NRI = 24.8 %). Fluid overload, as assessed by bioimpedance, and not by lung ultrasonography, improves risk prediction for death, beyond classical and echocardiographic-based risk prediction scores/parameters.

Indexed as

Electric ImpedanceFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicLungMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsRenal DialysisReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival AnalysisWater-Electrolyte BalanceBioimpedanceEchocardiographyFluid statusHemodialysisLung ultrasonographySurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.