Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26428008›Full record

ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2015

Mechano-logical model of C. elegans germ line suggests feedback on the cell cycle.

Kathryn Atwell, Zhao Qin, David Gavaghan, Hillel Kugler, E Jane Albert Hubbard, James M Osborne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Biology of theGenetics · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Oscillatory fluid flow drives scaling of contraction wave with system size.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Mechanocellular models of epithelial morphogenesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathryn AtwellComputational Biology Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK Biological Computation Group, Computational Science Laboratory, Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 2FB, UK.
Zhao QinSkirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Kimmel Center for Stem Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA.
David GavaghanComputational Biology Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK.
Hillel KuglerBiological Computation Group, Computational Science Laboratory, Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 2FB, UK Faculty of Engineering, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel.
E Jane Albert HubbardSkirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine, Department of Cell Biology and Kimmel Center for Stem Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA jane.hubbard@med.nyu.edu jmosborne@unimelb.edu.au.
James M OsborneComputational Biology Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK Biological Computation Group, Computational Science Laboratory, Microsoft Research Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 2FB, UK School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia jane.hubbard@med.nyu.edu jmosborne@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
CONTROL ONSET OF MEIOSIS IN C. ELEGANSR01GM061706 · NIGMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HUBBARD, E. JANE ALBERT · 2000 to 2018
$5.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061706NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM61706NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Caenorhabditis elegans germ line is an outstanding model system in which to study the control of cell division and differentiation. Although many of the molecules that regulate germ cell proliferation and fate decisions have been identified, how these signals interact with cellular dynamics and physical forces within the gonad remains poorly understood. We therefore developed a dynamic, 3D in silico model of the C. elegans germ line, incorporating both the mechanical interactions between cells and the decision-making processes within cells. Our model successfully reproduces key features of the germ line during development and adulthood, including a reasonable ovulation rate, correct sperm count, and appropriate organization of the germ line into stably maintained zones. The model highlights a previously overlooked way in which germ cell pressure may influence gonadogenesis, and also predicts that adult germ cells might be subject to mechanical feedback on the cell cycle akin to contact inhibition. We provide experimental data consistent with the latter hypothesis. Finally, we present cell trajectories and ancestry recorded over the course of a simulation. The novel approaches and software described here link mechanics and cellular decision-making, and are applicable to modeling other developmental and stem cell systems.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSoftwareAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCaenorhabditis elegansCell CycleCell DifferentiationComputer SimulationFeedback, PhysiologicalGerm CellsC. elegansContact inhibitionGerm lineMechanicsModelingStem cell

Identifiers

PMID26428008
PMCPMC4712881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.