Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26427548›Full record

ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2016

PatchSurfers: Two methods for local molecular property-based binding ligand prediction.

Woong-Hee Shin, Mark Gregory Bures, Daisuke Kihara

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Woong-Hee ShinDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Mark Gregory BuresDiscovery Chemistry Research and Technologies, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
Daisuke KiharaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA; Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. Electronic address: dkihara@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · USEli Lilly (United States) · US

Funding

Identification of protein-metabolite interactome.R01GM097528 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097528NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM097528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein function prediction is an active area of research in computational biology. Function prediction can help biologists make hypotheses for characterization of genes and help interpret biological assays, and thus is a productive area for collaboration between experimental and computational biologists. Among various function prediction methods, predicting binding ligand molecules for a target protein is an important class because ligand binding events for a protein are usually closely intertwined with the proteins' biological function, and also because predicted binding ligands can often be directly tested by biochemical assays. Binding ligand prediction methods can be classified into two types: those which are based on protein-protein (or pocket-pocket) comparison, and those that compare a target pocket directly to ligands. Recently, our group proposed two computational binding ligand prediction methods, Patch-Surfer, which is a pocket-pocket comparison method, and PL-PatchSurfer, which compares a pocket to ligand molecules. The two programs apply surface patch-based descriptions to calculate similarity or complementarity between molecules. A surface patch is characterized by physicochemical properties such as shape, hydrophobicity, and electrostatic potentials. These properties on the surface are represented using three-dimensional Zernike descriptors (3DZD), which are based on a series expansion of a 3 dimensional function. Utilizing 3DZD for describing the physicochemical properties has two main advantages: (1) rotational invariance and (2) fast comparison. Here, we introduce Patch-Surfer and PL-PatchSurfer with an emphasis on PL-PatchSurfer, which is more recently developed. Illustrative examples of PL-PatchSurfer performance on binding ligand prediction as well as virtual drug screening are also provided.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinBinding SitesComputational BiologyForecastingLigandsProtein BindingProteinsProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiaryLigandsProteins3D Zernike descriptorLigand binding pocketsLigand–protein interactionPatch-SurferProtein function predictionStructure–function relationship

Identifiers

PMID26427548
PMCPMC4718779
OpenAlexW2214858482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.