Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26427513›Full record

ArticleCancer gene therapy2015

Integrated analysis of gene expression and genomic aberration data in osteosarcoma (OS).

Y Xiong, S Wu, Q Du, A Wang, Z Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer gene therapy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification of a Two-Gene (Frontiers in oncology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Y XiongDepartment of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
S WuDepartment of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Q DuDepartment of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
A WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Z WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Army Medical University · CNDaping Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytogenetic analyses have revealed that complex karyotypes with numerous and highly variable genomic aberrations including single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and copy number variants (CNVs), are observed in most of the conventional osteosarcomas (OSs). Several genome-wide studies have reported that the dysregulated expression of many genes is correlated with genomic aberrations in OS. We first compared OS gene expression in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) data sets and genomic aberrations in International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) database to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with SNPs or CNVs in OS. Then the function annotation of SNP- or CNV-associated DEGs was performed in terms of gene ontology analysis, pathway analysis and protein-protein interactions (PPIs). Finally, the expression of genes correlated with both SNPs and CNVs were confirmed by quantitative reverse-transcription PCR. Eight publicly available GEO data sets were obtained, and a set of 979 DEGs were identified (472 upregulated and 507 downregulated DEGs). Moreover, we obtained 1039 SNPs mapped in 938 genes, and 583 CNV sites mapped in 2915 genes. Comparing genomic aberrations and DGEs, we found 41 SNP-associated DEGs and 124 CNV-associated DEGs, in which 7 DGEs were associated with both SNPs and CNVs, including WWP1, EXT1, LDHB, C8orf59, PLEKHA5, CCT3 and VWF. The result of function annotation showed that ossification, bone development and skeletal system development were the significantly enriched terms of biological processes for DEGs. PPI network analysis showed that CCT3, COPS3 and WWP1 were the significant hub proteins. We conclude that these genes, including CCT3, COPS3 and WWP1 are candidate driver genes of importance in OS tumorigenesis.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsBone NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsGene Regulatory NetworksHumansOsteosarcomaPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosisProtein Interaction MappingProtein Interaction MapsSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID26427513
OpenAlexW2235118645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.