Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26426996›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

c-MYC Copy-Number Gain Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Kyu Sang Lee, Yoonjin Kwak, Kyung Han Nam, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Gheeyoung Choe, Woo Ho Kim, Hye Seung Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. RETRACTED: The Impact ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Molecular genetics of early-onset colorectal cancer.World journal of biological chemistry · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Significant position of C-myc in colorectal cancer: a promising therapeutic target.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kyu Sang LeeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Yoonjin KwakDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Han NamDepartment of Pathology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Duck-Woo KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Bum KangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Gheeyoung ChoeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea; Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woo Ho KimDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hye Seung LeeDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KRInje University Haeundae Paik Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the incidence and clinicopathological significance of c-MYC gene copy-number (GCN) gain in patients with primary colorectal cancer (CRC).

methodsThe c-MYC GCN was investigated in 367 consecutive CRC patients (cohort 1) by using dual-color silver in situ hybridization. Additionally, to evaluate regional heterogeneity, we examined CRC tissue from 3 sites including the primary cancer, distant metastasis, and lymph-node metastasis in 152 advanced CRC patients (cohort 2). KRAS exons 2 and 3 were investigated for mutations.

resultsIn cohort 1, c-MYC gene amplification, defined by a c-MYC:centromere of chromosome 8 ratio ≥ 2.0, was detected in 31 (8.4%) of 367 patients. A c-MYC GCN gain, defined by ≥ 4.0 c-MYC copies/nucleus, was found in 63 (17.2%) patients and was associated with poor prognosis (P = 0.015). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the hazard ratio for c-MYC GCN gain was 2.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.453-3.802; P < 0.001). In a subgroup of stage II-III CRC patients, c-MYC GCN gain was significantly associated with poor prognosis by univariate (P = 0.034) and multivariate (P = 0.040) analyses. c-MYC protein overexpression was observed in 201 (54.8%) out of 367 patients and weakly correlated with c-MYC GCN gain (ρ, 0.211). In cohort 2, the c-MYC genetic status was heterogenous in advanced CRC patients. Discordance between GCN gain in the primary tumor and either distant or lymph-node metastasis was 25.7% and 30.4%, respectively. A similar frequency for c-MYC GCN gain and amplification was observed in CRC patients with both wild-type and mutated KRAS.

conclusionsc-MYC GCN gain was an independent factor for poor prognosis in consecutive CRC patients and in the stage II-III subgroup. Our findings indicate that the status of c-MYC may be helpful in predicting the patients' outcome and for managing CRC patients.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene DosageHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesIn Situ HybridizationLiver NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID26426996
PMCPMC4591346
OpenAlexW2197459376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.