Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26426695›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

The GSTome Reflects the Chemical Environment of White-Rot Fungi.

Aurélie Deroy, Fanny Saiag, Zineb Kebbi-Benkeder, Nassim Touahri, Arnaud Hecker, Mélanie Morel-Rouhier, Francis Colin, Stephane Dumarcay, Philippe Gérardin, Eric Gelhaye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Wood Degradation byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aurélie DeroyUniversité de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, UMR1136, F-54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; INRA, Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, UMR1136, F-54280, Champenoux, France.
Fanny SaiagUniversité de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, UMR1136, F-54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; INRA, Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, UMR1136, F-54280, Champenoux, France.
Zineb Kebbi-BenkederLaboratoire d'Etudes et de Recherches sur le Matériau Bois, EA4370 Université de Lorraine USC INRA, Faculté des Sciences et Technologies, 54506, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France; AgroParisTech, UMR 1092 LERFOB, F-54000, Nancy, France; INRA, UMR 1092 LERFOB, F-54280, Champenoux, France.
Nassim TouahriLaboratoire d'Etudes et de Recherches sur le Matériau Bois, EA4370 Université de Lorraine USC INRA, Faculté des Sciences et Technologies, 54506, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France; AgroParisTech, UMR 1092 LERFOB, F-54000, Nancy, France; INRA, UMR 1092 LERFOB, F-54280, Champenoux, France.
Arnaud HeckerUniversité de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, UMR1136, F-54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; INRA, Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, UMR1136, F-54280, Champenoux, France.
Mélanie Morel-RouhierUniversité de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, UMR1136, F-54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; INRA, Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, UMR1136, F-54280, Champenoux, France.
Francis ColinAgroParisTech, UMR 1092 LERFOB, F-54000, Nancy, France; INRA, UMR 1092 LERFOB, F-54280, Champenoux, France.
Stephane DumarcayLaboratoire d'Etudes et de Recherches sur le Matériau Bois, EA4370 Université de Lorraine USC INRA, Faculté des Sciences et Technologies, 54506, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Philippe GérardinLaboratoire d'Etudes et de Recherches sur le Matériau Bois, EA4370 Université de Lorraine USC INRA, Faculté des Sciences et Technologies, 54506, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Eric GelhayeUniversité de Lorraine, Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, UMR1136, F-54500, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France; INRA, Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes, UMR1136, F-54280, Champenoux, France.
Interactions Arbres-Microorganismes · FRUniversité de Lorraine · FRAgroParisTech · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White-rot fungi possess the unique ability to degrade and mineralize all the different components of wood. In other respects, wood durability, among other factors, is due to the presence of extractives that are potential antimicrobial molecules. To cope with these molecules, wood decay fungi have developed a complex detoxification network including glutathione transferases (GST). The interactions between GSTs from two white-rot fungi, Trametes versicolor and Phanerochaete chrysosporium, and an environmental library of wood extracts have been studied. The results demonstrate that the specificity of these interactions is closely related to the chemical composition of the extracts in accordance with the tree species and their localization inside the wood (sapwood vs heartwood vs knotwood). These data suggest that the fungal GSTome could reflect the chemical environment encountered by these fungi during wood degradation and could be a way to study their adaptation to their way of life.

Indexed as

GenomicsAcetoneGlutathione TransferasePhanerochaetePlant ExtractsProtein BindingSubstrate SpecificityTrametesWoodAcetoneGlutathione TransferasePlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID26426695
PMCPMC4591263
OpenAlexW2183952819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.