Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26426652›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2015

The Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer of Women With Endometriosis May be Varied Greatly if Diagnostic Criteria Are Different: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

Wen-Ling Lee, Wen-Hsun Chang, Kuan-Chin Wang, Chao-Yu Guo, Yiing-Jeng Chou, Nicole Huang, Hsin-Yi Huang, Ming-Shyen Yen, Peng-Hui Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Immunology and ovarian cancers.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020
    Review
  5. Aberrant sialylation in ovarian cancers.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wen-Ling LeeFrom the Department of Nursing, Oriental Institute of Technology, New Taipei City (W-LL, K-CW); Department of Medicine, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital (W-LL); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (W-LL, M-SY, P-HW); Department of Nursing (W-LL, W-HC, P-HW); Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration and Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan (C-YG, Y-JC, NH); Department of Nursing (W-HC); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (W-HC, M-SY, P-HW); Biostatics Task Force, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan (H-YH); Department of Medical Research (P-HW); and China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Wen-Hsun Chang
Kuan-Chin Wang
Chao-Yu Guo
Yiing-Jeng Chou
Nicole Huang
Hsin-Yi Huang
Ming-Shyen Yen
Peng-Hui Wang
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article aims to test the hypothesis that the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in women with endometriosis might be changed by enrolling different population. A nationwide 14-year historic cohort study using the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan and the Registry for Catastrophic Illness Patients was conducted. A total of 239,385 women aged between 20 and 51 years, with at least 1 gynecologic visit after 2000, were analyzed. Cases included women with a diagnosed endometriosis, which was established along a spectrum from at least 1 medical record of endometriosis (recalled endometriosis) to tissue-proved ovarian endometriosis (n = X). Controls included women without any diagnosis of endometriosis (n = 239,385 - X). We used Cox regression, and computed hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) to determine the risk of EOC in patients. The EOC incidence rates (IRs, per 10,000 person-years) of women with endometriosis ranged from 1.90 in women with recalled endometriosis to 18.70 in women with tissue-proved ovarian endometrioma, compared with those women without any diagnosis of endometriosis (0.77-0.89), contributing to crude HRs ranging from 2.59 (95% CI, 2.09-3.21; P < 0.001) to 24.04 (95% CI, 17.48-33.05; P < 0.001). After adjustment for pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, Charlson co-morbidity index, and age, adjusted HRs were ranged from the lowest of 1.90 (95% CI, 1.51-2.37; P < 0.001) in recalled endometriosis to the highest of 18.57 (95% CI, 13.37-25.79; P < 0.001) in tissue-proved ovarian endometrioma, which was inversely related to the prevalence rate of endometriosis (from the highest of 30.80% in recalled endometriosis to the lowest of 1.54% in tissue-proved ovarian endometrioma). The risk of EOC in women with endometriosis varied greatly by different criteria used. Women with endometriosis might have a more apparently higher risk than those reported by systematic review and meta-analysis.

Indexed as

AdultCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCase-Control StudiesCatastrophic IllnessCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualEndometriosisFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsRegistriesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26426652
PMCPMC4616839
OpenAlexW2331977245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.