Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26426061›Full record

ArticleMembranes2015

The Effect of the Nonlinearity of the Response of Lipid Membranes to Voltage Perturbations on the Interpretation of Their Electrical Properties. A New Theoretical Description.

Lars D Mosgaard, Karis A Zecchi, Thomas Heimburg, Rima Budvytyte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lars D MosgaardNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark. l.d.mosgaard@gmail.com.
Karis A ZecchiNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark. zecchi@nbi.dk.
Thomas HeimburgNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark. theimbu@nbi.dk.
Rima BudvytyteNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark. rima.budvytyte@nbi.dk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the electrical properties of cell membranes is derived from experiments where the membrane is exposed to a perturbation (in the form of a time-dependent voltage or current change) and information is extracted from the measured output. The interpretation of such electrical recordings consists in finding an electronic equivalent that would show the same or similar response as the biological system. In general, however, there is no unique circuit configuration, which can explain a single electrical recording and the choice of an electric model for a biological system is based on complementary information (most commonly structural information) of the system investigated. Most of the electrophysiological data on cell membranes address the functional role of protein channels while assuming that the lipid matrix is an insulator with constant capacitance. However, close to their melting transition the lipid bilayers are no inert insulators. Their conductivity and their capacitance are nonlinear functions of both voltage, area and volume density. This has to be considered when interpreting electrical data. Here we show how electric data commonly interpreted as gating currents of proteins and inductance can be explained by the nonlinear dynamics of the lipid matrix itself.

Indexed as

capacitanceconductionelectrophysiologyimpedanceinductancelipid membrane

Identifiers

PMID26426061
PMCPMC4703996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.