Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26426043›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2015

Body Mass Index and Risk of Gallbladder Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Wenbin Tan, Min Gao, Ning Liu, Guoan Zhang, Tong Xu, Wen Cui

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Risk Factors and Prognostic Factors in GBC.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Gallbladder cancer: 7-Year experience from Qatar.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Body Size Indicators and Risk of Gallbladder Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Individual-Level Data from 19 Prospective Cohort Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenbin TanDepartment of Basical Medicine, Jining Medical University, 16 Hehua Road, Jining 272067, China. lzhzsdxsyx@gmail.com.
Min GaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Jining NO.1 People's Hospital, 6 Jiankang Road, Jining 272011, China. medchenjun@126.com.
Ning LiuDepartment of Information Technology, Jining Medical University, 16 Hehua Road, Jining 272067, China. liuningsci@126.com.
Guoan ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Jining Medical University, 16 Hehua Road, Jining 272067, China. zga2007@126.com.
Tong XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, 79 Guhuai Road, Jining 272029, China. ciwinglee@126.com.
Wen CuiDepartment of Pathology, Jining Medical University, 16 Hehua Road, Jining 272067, China. cuiwenmd@sina.com.
Jining Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University · CNJining First People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo provide a quantitative assessment of the association between excess body weight, interpreted as increased body mass index (BMI), and the risk of gallbladder cancer (GBC).

methodsWe identified eligible studies in Medline and EMBASE up to 1 February 2015, and reference lists of retrieved articles. Summary relative risks with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated in a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed according to study design, gender, geographic location, ascertainment of exposure and adjustment for confounders. RESUITS: A total of 12 cohort studies and 8 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with "normal" weight, the summary relative risks of GBC were 1.14 (95% CI, 1.04-1.25) for overweight individuals (BMI 25-30 kg/m²) and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.41-1.73) for obese individuals (BMI > 30 kg/m²). Obese women had a higher risk of GBC than men did (women: SRRs 1.67, 95% CI 1.38-2.02; men: SRRs 1.42, 95% CI 1.21-1.66), and there was significant association between overweight and GBC risk in women (SRRs 1.26, 95% CI 1.13-1.40), but not in men (SRRs 1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.20).

conclusionsFindings from this meta-analysis indicate that obesity is associated with an increased risk of GBC, especially in women. Overweight is associated with GBC risk only in women.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsGallstonesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMEDLINEObesityOverweightRiskRisk FactorsSex Factorsbody mass indexgallbladder cancermeta-analysisobesityoverweight

Identifiers

PMID26426043
PMCPMC4632410
OpenAlexW2150693442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.