Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26426040›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2015

Methylene Blue-Loaded Dissolving Microneedles: Potential Use in Photodynamic Antimicrobial Chemotherapy of Infected Wounds.

Ester Caffarel-Salvador, Mary-Carmel Kearney, Rachel Mairs, Luigi Gallo, Sarah A Stewart, Aaron J Brady, Ryan F Donnelly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Microneedle arrays for the treatment of chronic wounds.Expert opinion on drug delivery · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ester Caffarel-SalvadorSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Co. Antrim BT9 7BL, UK. ecaffarelsalvador01@qub.ac.uk.
Mary-Carmel KearneySchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Co. Antrim BT9 7BL, UK. mkearney16@qub.ac.uk.
Rachel MairsSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Co. Antrim BT9 7BL, UK. rmairs06@qub.ac.uk.
Luigi GalloSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Co. Antrim BT9 7BL, UK. luigigallo95@gmail.com.
Sarah A StewartSchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Co. Antrim BT9 7BL, UK. sstewart35@qub.ac.uk.
Aaron J BradySchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Co. Antrim BT9 7BL, UK. aaron.brady@qub.ac.uk.
Ryan F DonnellySchool of Pharmacy, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Co. Antrim BT9 7BL, UK. r.donnelly@qub.ac.uk.
Queen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy involves delivery of a photosensitising drug that is activated by light of a specific wavelength, resulting in generation of highly reactive radicals. This activated species can cause destruction of targeted cells. Application of this process for treatment of microbial infections has been termed "photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy" (PACT). In the treatment of chronic wounds, the delivery of photosensitising agents is often impeded by the presence of a thick hyperkeratotic/necrotic tissue layer, reducing their therapeutic efficacy. Microneedles (MNs) are an emerging drug delivery technology that have been demonstrated to successfully penetrate the outer layers of the skin, whilst minimising damage to skin barrier function. Delivering photosensitising drugs using this platform has been demonstrated to have several advantages over conventional photodynamic therapy, such as, painless application, reduced erythema, enhanced cosmetic results and improved intradermal delivery. The aim of this study was to physically characterise dissolving MNs loaded with the photosensitising agent, methylene blue and assess their photodynamic antimicrobial activity. Dissolving MNs were fabricated from aqueous blends of Gantrez(®) AN-139 co-polymer containing varying loadings of methylene blue. A height reduction of 29.8% was observed for MNs prepared from blends containing 0.5% w/w methylene blue following application of a total force of 70.56 N/array. A previously validated insertion test was used to assess the effect of drug loading on MN insertion into a wound model. Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Candida albicans biofilms were incubated with various methylene blue concentrations within the range delivered by MNs in vitro (0.1-2.5 mg/mL) and either irradiated at 635 nm using a Paterson Lamp or subjected to a dark period. Microbial susceptibility to PACT was determined by assessing the total viable count. Kill rates of >96%, were achieved for S. aureus and >99% for E. coli and C. albicans with the combination of PACT and methylene blue concentrations between 0.1 and 2.5 mg/mL. A reduction in the colony count was also observed when incorporating the photosensitiser without irradiation, this reduction was more notable in S. aureus and E. coli strains than in C. albicans.

Indexed as

microneedlePACTphotosensitiserwound

Identifiers

PMID26426040
PMCPMC4695826
OpenAlexW2164101851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.