Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26425965›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2016

Simulation of biological therapies for degenerated intervertebral discs.

Qiaoqiao Zhu, Xin Gao, H Thomas Temple, Mark D Brown, Weiyong Gu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Simulation of water content distributions in degenerated human intervertebral discs.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qiaoqiao ZhuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Coral Gables, Florida.
Xin GaoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida.
H Thomas TempleDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, NOVA Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Mark D BrownDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Weiyong GuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Coral Gables, Florida.
University of Miami · USClinical Research of South Florida · USNova Southeastern University · US

Funding

Modeling of Intervertebral Disc DegenerationR21AR066240 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI CORAL GABLES · PI GU, WEIYONG · 2015 to 2016
$349k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR066240NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR066240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of biological therapies on intervertebral disc repair was quantitatively studied using a three-dimensional finite element model based on a cell-activity coupled multiphasic mixture theory. In this model, cell metabolism and matrix synthesis and degradation were considered. Three types of biological therapies-increasing the cell density (Case I), increasing the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) synthesis rate (Case II), and decreasing the GAG degradation rate (Case III)-to the nucleus pulposus (NP) of each of two degenerated discs [one mildly degenerated (e.g., 80% viable cells in the NP) and one severely degenerated (e.g., 30% viable cells in the NP)] were simulated. Degenerated discs without treatment were also simulated as a control. The cell number needed, nutrition level demanded, time required for the repair, and the long-term outcomes of these therapies were analyzed. For Case I, the repair process was predicted to be dependent on the cell density implanted and the nutrition level at disc boundaries. With sufficient nutrition supply, this method was predicted to be effective for treating both mildly and severely degenerated discs. For Case II, the therapy was predicted to be effective for repairing the mildly degenerated disc, but not for the severely degenerated disc. Similar results were predicted for Case III. No change in cell density for Cases II and III were predicted under normal nutrition level. This study provides a quantitative guide for choosing proper strategies of biological therapies for different degenerated discs.

Indexed as

Biological TherapyFinite Element AnalysisGlycosaminoglycansHumansIntervertebral Disc DegenerationGlycosaminoglycansbiomechanicsdisc repairfinite element model

Identifiers

PMID26425965
PMCPMC4833445
OpenAlexW1942787630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.