Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26425902›Full record

ArticleHealth physics2015

Lymphoid and Myeloid Recovery in Rhesus Macaques Following Total Body X-Irradiation.

Ann M Farese, Kim G Hankey, Melanie Veirs Cohen, Thomas J MacVittie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Incidence of Post-Sedation Emesis in Cynomolgus (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The TLR2/TLR6 ligand FSL-1 mitigates radiation-induced hematopoietic injury in mice and nonhuman primates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Long-Term Immunological Consequences of Radiation Exposure in a Diverse Cohort of Rhesus Macaques.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ann M Farese*University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, Baltimore, MD; †NIAID Integrated Research Facility, Frederick, MD.
Kim G Hankey
Melanie Veirs Cohen
Thomas J MacVittie
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Immune Reconstitution in Nonhuman PrimatesR01AI067503 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MACVITTIE, THOMAS J · 2005 to 2005
$500k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI067503PHS HHS R01 A167503‐1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovery from severe immunosuppression requires hematopoietic stem cell reconstitution and effective thymopoiesis to restore a functional immune cell repertoire. Herein, a model of immune cell reconstitution consequent to potentially lethal doses of irradiation is described, which may be valuable in evaluating potential medical countermeasures. Male rhesus macaques were total body irradiated by exposure to 6.00 Gy 250 kVp x-radiation (midline tissue dose, 0.13 Gy min), resulting in an approximate LD10/60 (n = 5/59). Animals received medical management, and hematopoietic and immune cell recovery was assessed (n ≤ 14) through 370 d post exposure. A subset of animals (n ≤ 8) was examined through 700 d. Myeloid recovery was assessed by neutrophil and platelet-related parameters. Lymphoid recovery was assessed by the absolute lymphocyte count and FACS-based phenotyping of B- and T-cell subsets. Recent thymic emigrants were identified by T cell receptor excision circle quantification. Severe neutropenia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia resolved within 30 d. Total CD3+ cells μL required 60 d to reach values 60% of normal, followed by subsequent slow recovery to approximately normal by 180 d post irradiation. Recovery of CD3+4+ and CD3+8+ cell memory and naïve subsets were markedly different. Memory populations were ≥ 100% of normal by day 60, whereas naïve populations were only 57% normal at 180 d and never fully recovered to baseline post irradiation. Total (CD20+) B cells μL were within normal levels by 77 d post exposure. This animal model elucidates the variable T- and B-cell subset recovery kinetics after a potentially lethal dose of total-body irradiation that are dependent on marrow-derived stem and progenitor cell recovery, peripheral homeostatic expansion, and thymopoiesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsImmune Reconstitution Inflammatory SyndromeLeukemia, Radiation-InducedLymphocytesMacaca mulattaMaleMyeloid CellsRadiation DosageRecovery of FunctionWhole-Body IrradiationX-Rays

Identifiers

PMID26425902
PMCPMC4593069
OpenAlexW2424330795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.