Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26425265›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2015

Detection methods and clinical significance of free peritoneal tumor cells found during colorectal cancer surgery.

Simone Sibio, Cristina Fiorani, Carmine Stolfi, Andrea Divizia, Roberto Pezzuto, Fabrizio Montagnese, Giulia Bagaglini, Paolo Sammartino, Giuseppe Sigismondo Sica

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Simone SibioSimone Sibio, Paolo Sammartino, Department of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, 00155 Rome, Italy.
Cristina FioraniSimone Sibio, Paolo Sammartino, Department of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, 00155 Rome, Italy.
Carmine StolfiSimone Sibio, Paolo Sammartino, Department of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, 00155 Rome, Italy.
Andrea DiviziaSimone Sibio, Paolo Sammartino, Department of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, 00155 Rome, Italy.
Roberto PezzutoSimone Sibio, Paolo Sammartino, Department of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, 00155 Rome, Italy.
Fabrizio MontagneseSimone Sibio, Paolo Sammartino, Department of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, 00155 Rome, Italy.
Giulia BagagliniSimone Sibio, Paolo Sammartino, Department of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, 00155 Rome, Italy.
Paolo SammartinoSimone Sibio, Paolo Sammartino, Department of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, 00155 Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe Sigismondo SicaSimone Sibio, Paolo Sammartino, Department of Surgery Pietro Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, 00155 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peritoneal washing is now part of the standard clinical practice in several abdominal and pelvic neoplasias. However, in colorectal cancer surgery, intra-peritoneal free cancer cells (IFCC) presence is not routinely investigated and their prognostic meaning is still unclear. When peritoneal washing results are positive for the presence of IFCC a worse outcome is usually expected in these colorectal cancer operated patients, but it what is not clear is whether it is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence. It is authors' belief that one of the main reasons why IFCC are not researched as integral part of the routine staging system for colon cancer is that there still isn't a diagnostic or detection method with enough sensibility and specificity. However, the potential clinical implications of a routine research for the presence IFCC in colon neoplasias are enormous: not only to obtain a more accurate clinical staging but also to offer different therapy protocols, based on the presence of IFCC. Based on this, adjuvant chemotherapy could be offered to those patients found to be positive for IFCC; also, protocols of proactive intraperitoneal chemotherapy could be applied. Although presence of IFCC appears to have a valid prognostic significance, further studies are needed to standardize detection and examination procedures, to determine if there are and which are the stages more likely to benefit from routine search for IFCC.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerCytologyFree cancer cellsPeritoneal recurrenceProactive treatment

Identifiers

PMID26425265
PMCPMC4582234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.