ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
smallWig: parallel compression of RNA-seq WIG files.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Productive visualization of high-throughput sequencing data using the SeqCode open portable platform.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Balancing efficient analysis and storage of quantitative genomics data with the D4 format and d4tools.Nature computational science · 2021Article
- ChIPWig: a random access-enabling lossless and lossy compression method for ChIP-seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Single-cell Transcriptome Study as Big Data.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contributionsWe developed a new lossless compression method for WIG data, named smallWig, offering the best known compression rates for RNA-seq data and featuring random access functionalities that enable visualization, summary statistics analysis and fast queries from the compressed files. Our approach results in order of magnitude improvements compared with bigWig and ensures compression rates only a fraction of those produced by cWig. The key features of the smallWig algorithm are statistical data analysis and a combination of source coding methods that ensure high flexibility and make the algorithm suitable for different applications. Furthermore, for general-purpose file compression, the compression rate of smallWig approaches the empirical entropy of the tested WIG data. For compression with random query features, smallWig uses a simple block-based compression scheme that introduces only a minor overhead in the compression rate. For archival or storage space-sensitive applications, the method relies on context mixing techniques that lead to further improvements of the compression rate. Implementations of smallWig can be executed in parallel on different sets of chromosomes using multiple processors, thereby enabling desirable scaling for future transcriptome Big Data platforms. MOTIVATION: The development of next-generation sequencing technologies has led to a dramatic decrease in the cost of DNA/RNA sequencing and expression profiling. RNA-seq has emerged as an important and inexpensive technology that provides information about whole transcriptomes of various species and organisms, as well as different organs and cellular communities. The vast volume of data generated by RNA-seq experiments has significantly increased data storage costs and communication bandwidth requirements. Current compression tools for RNA-seq data such as bigWig and cWig either use general-purpose compressors (gzip) or suboptimal compression schemes that leave significant room for improvement. To substantiate this claim, we performed a statistical analysis of expression data in different transform domains and developed accompanying entropy coding methods that bridge the gap between theoretical and practical WIG file compression rates.
resultsWe tested different variants of the smallWig compression algorithm on a number of integer-and real- (floating point) valued RNA-seq WIG files generated by the ENCODE project. The results reveal that, on average, smallWig offers 18-fold compression rate improvements, up to 2.5-fold compression time improvements, and 1.5-fold decompression time improvements when compared with bigWig. On the tested files, the memory usage of the algorithm never exceeded 90 KB. When more elaborate context mixing compressors were used within smallWig, the obtained compression rates were as much as 23 times better than those of bigWig. For smallWig used in the random query mode, which also supports retrieval of the summary statistics, an overhead in the compression rate of roughly 3-17% was introduced depending on the chosen system parameters. An increase in encoding and decoding time of 30% and 55% represents an additional performance loss caused by enabling random data access. We also implemented smallWig using multi-processor programming. This parallelization feature decreases the encoding delay 2-3.4 times compared with that of a single-processor implementation, with the number of processors used ranging from 2 to 8; in the same parameter regime, the decoding delay decreased 2-5.2 times. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The smallWig software can be downloaded from: http://stanford.edu/~zhiyingw/smallWig/smallwig.html, http://publish.illinois.edu/milenkovic/, http://web.stanford.edu/~tsachy/. CONTACT: zhiyingw@stanford.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.