Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26424690›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2015

Significance of CD4+ T-cell count in the management of appendicitis in patients with HIV.

Kumiko Kitaoka, Kazuhiro Saito, Koichi Tokuuye

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 75% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acute Appendicitis in Childhood and Adulthood.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of appendicitis in a population with a high HIV-infection prevalence.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kumiko KitaokaAll authors are from the Radiology Department, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiro SaitoAll authors are from the Radiology Department, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi TokuuyeAll authors are from the Radiology Department, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryIdentification of complicated appendicitis (CA) is critical to the management of appendicitis. However, previous studies have not investigated indicators of CA among patients with HIV or whether it is safe to use conservative treatment for appendicitis in these patients. Among 322 patients with appendicitis, we identified 14 who had HIV. Six of them were operated and 8 were treated with antibiotics; CA was diagnosed in 4. Patients with HIV and CA had a significantly lower CD4+ T-cell count than those with uncomplicated appendicitis. A white blood cell count lower than 7.4 × 10(9)/L was observed exclusively in patients with CA. No patient with HIV whose appendicitis was treated conservatively died or experienced a recurrence. We discuss our findings, which suggest the possibility of conservative treatment of appendicitis in patients with HIV and identification of CA by low CD4+ T-cell count.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisHIVImmunity, CellularCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesHIV InfectionsHumansLymphocyte Count

Identifiers

PMID26424690
PMCPMC4651698
OpenAlexW2415727535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.