Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26424647›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2015

EBV Persistence--Introducing the Virus.

David A Thorley-Lawson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 229 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
229citing papers in PubMed
55.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

229 citing papers in PubMed, 336 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A tonsil organoid model reveals Epstein-Barr virus-infected germinal center B cell states during primary infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. The ageing immune system and its battle with viruses.The Journal of general virology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Cellular Metabolic Signatures of Long COVID-19.Infectious disease reports · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Increased Frequency of the Chemokine Receptor CCR2 on Circulating CD19+CD5+ Lymphocytes in Therapy-Naïve CLL Patients With the Detectable EBV DNA and High-Avidity Antibodies Against the EBV Capsid Antigen.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

169 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David A Thorley-LawsonSchool of Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, 02111, USA. david.thorley-lawson@tufts.edu.
Tufts University · US

Funding

HOST IMMUNITY TO EBV INFECTION IN VITRO AND IN VIVOR01AI018757 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI POLTORAK, ALEXANDER · 1985 to 2017
$6.7M
EPSTEIN BARR VIRUS LATENCYR01CA065883 · NCI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI THORLEY-LAWSON, DAVID A. · 1995 to 2014
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA065883NCI NIH HHS R01 CA65883NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI018757NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI18757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent infection by EBV is explained by the germinal center model (GCM) which provides a satisfying and currently the only explanation for EBVs disparate biology. Since the GCM touches on every aspect of the virus, this chapter will serve as an introduction to the subsequent chapters. EBV is B lymphotropic, and its biology closely follows that of normal mature B lymphocytes. The virus persists quiescently in resting memory B cells for the lifetime of the host in a non-pathogenic state that is also invisible to the immune response. To access this compartment, the virus infects naïve B cells in the lymphoepithelium of the tonsils and activates these cells using the growth transcription program. These cells migrate to the GC where they switch to a more limited transcription program, the default program, which helps rescue them into the memory compartment where the virus persists. For egress, the infected memory cells return to the lymphoepithelium where they occasionally differentiate into plasma cells activating viral replication. The released virus can either infect more naïve B cells or be amplified in the epithelium for shedding. This cycle of infection and the quiescent state in memory B cells allow for lifetime persistence at a very low level that is remarkably stable over time. Mathematically, this is a stable fixed point where the mechanisms regulating persistence drive the state back to equilibrium when perturbed. This is the GCM of EBV persistence. Other possible sites and mechanisms of persistence will also be discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsB-LymphocytesEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansVirus Replication

Identifiers

PMID26424647
PMCPMC5125397
OpenAlexW2285594441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.