Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26424609›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2016

Improving wound healing and preventing surgical site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A systematic review of the literature.

Alessandro Scalise, Roberto Calamita, Caterina Tartaglione, Marina Pierangeli, Elisa Bolletta, Matteo Gioacchini, Rosaria Gesuita, Giovanni Di Benedetto

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 103 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04584957 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Gynecologic Oncology: a Prospective Controlled Randomized Trial. (GO-VAC)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCatholic University of the Sacred HeartRan2020 to 2021Enrolled196ConditionsWound Infection, Gynecologic CancerArmsVAC therapy
NCT06493539 phase1withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Novel Application of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for the Post-Surgical Management of Lower Extremity Amputations: A Randomized Clinical Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled0ConditionsWound Heal, Wound DehiscenceArmsStandard of Care group, CINPWT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 237 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Negative pressure wound therapy in the management of postoperative spinal wound infections: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandro ScaliseDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Roberto CalamitaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Caterina TartaglioneDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Marina PierangeliDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Elisa BollettaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Matteo GioacchiniDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Rosaria GesuitaInterdepartmental Centre of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medical Informatics (EBI Centre), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Giovanni Di BenedettoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Marche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in preoperative care, surgical techniques and technologies have enabled surgeons to achieve primary closure in a high percentage of surgical procedures. However, often, underlying patient comorbidities in addition to surgical-related factors make the management of surgical wounds primary closure challenging because of the higher risk of developing complications. To date, extensive evidence exists, which demonstrate the benefits of negative pressure dressing in the treatment of open wounds; recently, Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (INPWT) technology as delivered by Prevena™ (KCI USA, Inc., San Antonio, TX) and Pico (Smith & Nephew Inc, Andover, MA) systems has been the focus of a new investigation on possible prophylactic measures to prevent complications via application immediately after surgery in high-risk, clean, closed surgical incisions. A systematic review was performed to evaluate INPWT's effect on surgical sites healing by primary intention. The primary outcomes of interest are an understanding of INPWT functioning and mechanisms of action, extrapolated from animal and biomedical engineering studies and incidence of complications (infection, dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, skin and fat necrosis, skin and fascial dehiscence or blistering) and other variables influenced by applying INPWT (re-operation and re-hospitalization rates, time to dry wound, cost saving) extrapolated from human studies. A search was conducted for published articles in various databases including PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus Database from 2006 to March 2014. Supplemental searches were performed using reference lists and conference proceedings. Studies selection was based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria and data extraction regarding study quality, model investigated, epidemiological and clinical characteristics and type of surgery, and the outcomes were applied to all the articles included. 1 biomedical engineering study, 2 animal studies, 15 human studies for a total of 6 randomized controlled trials, 5 prospective cohort studies, 7 retrospective analyses, were included. Human studies investigated the outcomes of 1042 incisions on 1003 patients. The literature shows a decrease in the incidence of infection, sero-haematoma formation and on the re-operation rates when using INPWT. Lower level of evidence was found on dehiscence, decreased in some studies, and was inconsistent to make a conclusion. Because of limited studies, it is difficult to make any assertions on the other variables, suggesting a requirement for further studies for proper recommendations on INPWT.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleHumansMaleNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyPrognosisQuality ImprovementRisk AssessmentSurgical WoundSurgical Wound InfectionWound HealingClosed woundsIncisional Negative Pressure Wound TherapySurgical incisionSurgical wound infectionWound healing

Identifiers

PMID26424609
PMCPMC7950088
OpenAlexW2169260477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.