Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26424579›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Spinal electro-magnetic stimulation combined with transgene delivery of neurotrophin NT-3 and exercise: novel combination therapy for spinal contusion injury.

Hayk A Petrosyan, Valentina Alessi, Arsen S Hunanyan, Sue A Sisto, Victor L Arvanian

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Combination of epidural electrical stimulation withNeural regeneration research · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hayk A PetrosyanNorthport Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Northport, New York; Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; and.
Valentina AlessiNorthport Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Northport, New York; Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; and.
Arsen S HunanyanNorthport Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Northport, New York;
Sue A SistoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.
Victor L ArvanianNorthport Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Northport, New York; Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; and victor.arvanian@stonybrook.edu.
Stony Brook University · USNorthport VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our recent terminal experiments revealed that administration of a single train of repetitive spinal electromagnetic stimulation (sEMS; 35 min) enhanced synaptic plasticity in spinal circuitry following lateral hemisection spinal cord injury. In the current study, we have examined effects of repetitive sEMS applied as a single train and chronically (5 wk, every other day) following thoracic T10 contusion. Chronic studies involved examination of systematic sEMS administration alone and combined with exercise training and transgene delivery of neurotrophin [adeno-associated virus 10-neurotrophin 3 (AAV10-NT3)]. Electrophysiological intracellular/extracellular recordings, immunohistochemistry, behavioral testing, and anatomical tracing were performed to assess effects of treatments. We found that administration of a single sEMS train induced transient facilitation of transmission through preserved lateral white matter to motoneurons and hindlimb muscles in chronically contused rats with effects lasting for at least 2 h. These physiological changes associated with increased immunoreactivity of GluR1 and GluR2/3 glutamate receptors in lumbar neurons. Systematic administration of sEMS alone for 5 wk, however, was unable to induce cumulative improvements of transmission in spinomuscular circuitry or improve impaired motor function following thoracic contusion. Encouragingly, chronic administration of sEMS, followed by exercise training (running in an exercise ball and swimming), induced the following: 1) sustained strengthening of transmission to lumbar motoneurons and hindlimb muscles, 2) better retrograde transport of anatomical tracer, and 3) improved locomotor function. Greatest improvements were seen in the group that received exercise combined with sEMS and AAV-NT3.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyNeuronal PlasticityAnimalsCombined Modality TherapyDependovirusEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleGenetic VectorsHindlimbMagnetic Field TherapyMagnetsMotor ActivityMotor NeuronsMuscle, SkeletalNeuronsNeurotrophin 3Neurotrophin 3Receptors, GlutamateAAVexercisemagnetic stimulationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID26424579
PMCPMC4737407
OpenAlexW2203815387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.