Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26424332›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2015

Role of the major antigenic membrane protein in phytoplasma transmission by two insect vector species.

Mahnaz Rashidi, Luciana Galetto, Domenico Bosco, Andrea Bulgarelli, Marta Vallino, Flavio Veratti, Cristina Marzachì

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multigene Typing of Croatian 'Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Silencing of ATP Synthase β Impairs Egg Development in the LeafhopperInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Phytoplasma diseases of plants: molecular diagnostics and way forward.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mahnaz RashidiIstituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, CNR, Torino, Italy. rashidii.mahnaz@gmail.com.
Luciana GalettoIstituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, CNR, Torino, Italy. luciana.galetto@ipsp.cnr.it.
Domenico BoscoIstituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, CNR, Torino, Italy. domenico.bosco@unito.it.
Andrea BulgarelliDISAFA, Università degli Studi di Torino, Grugliasco, TO, Italy. andrea.bulgarelli@edu.unito.it.
Marta VallinoIstituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, CNR, Torino, Italy. marta.vallino@ipsp.cnr.it.
Flavio VerattiIstituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, CNR, Torino, Italy. flavio.veratti@ipsp.cnr.it.
Cristina MarzachìIstituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, CNR, Torino, Italy. cristina.marzachi@ipsp.cnr.it.
Institute for Sustainable Plant Protection · ITUniversity of Idaho · USUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhytoplasmas are bacterial plant pathogens (class Mollicutes), transmitted by phloem feeding leafhoppers, planthoppers and psyllids in a persistent/propagative manner. Transmission of phytoplasmas is under the control of behavioral, environmental and geographical factors, but molecular interactions between membrane proteins of phytoplasma and vectors may also be involved. The aim of the work was to provide experimental evidence that in vivo interaction between phytoplasma antigenic membrane protein (Amp) and vector proteins has a role in the transmission process. In doing so, we also investigated the topology of the interaction at the gut epithelium and at the salivary glands, the two barriers encountered by the phytoplasma during vector colonization.

methodsExperiments were performed on the 'Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris' chrysanthemum yellows strain (CYP), and the two leafhopper vectors Macrosteles quadripunctulatus Kirschbaum and Euscelidius variegatus Kirschbaum. To specifically address the interaction of CYP Amp at the gut epithelium barrier, insects were artificially fed with media containing either the recombinant phytoplasma protein Amp, or the antibody (A416) or both, and transmission, acquisition and inoculation efficiencies were measured. An abdominal microinjection protocol was employed to specifically address the interaction of CYP Amp at the salivary gland barrier. Phytoplasma suspension was added with Amp or A416 or both, injected into healthy E. variegatus adults and then infection and inoculation efficiencies were measured. An internalization assay was developed, consisting of dissected salivary glands from healthy E. variegatus exposed to phytoplasma suspension alone or together with A416 antibody. The organs were then either observed in confocal microscopy or subjected to DNA extraction and phytoplasma quantification by qPCR, to visualize and quantify possible differences among treatments in localization/presence/number of CYP cells.

resultsArtificial feeding and abdominal microinjection protocols were developed to address the two barriers separately. The in vivo interactions between Amp of 'Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris' Chrysanthemum yellows strain (CYP) and vector proteins were studied by evaluating their effects on phytoplasma transmission by Euscelidius variegatus and Macrosteles quadripunctulatus leafhoppers. An internalization assay was developed, consisting of dissected salivary glands from healthy E. variegatus exposed to phytoplasma suspension alone or together with anti-Amp antibody. To visualize possible differences among treatments in localization/presence of CYP cells, the organs were observed in confocal microscopy. Pre-feeding of E. variegatus and M. quadripunctulatus on anti-Amp antibody resulted in a significant decrease of acquisition efficiencies in both species. Inoculation efficiency of microinjected E. variegatus with CYP suspension and anti-Amp antibody was significantly reduced compared to that of the control with phytoplasma suspension only. The possibility that this was due to reduced infection efficiency or antibody-mediated inhibition of phytoplasma multiplication was ruled out. These results provided the first indirect proof of the role of Amp in the transmission process.

conclusionProtocols were developed to assess the in vivo role of the phytoplasma native major antigenic membrane protein in two phases of the vector transmission process: movement through the midgut epithelium and colonization of the salivary glands. These methods will be useful also to characterize other phytoplasma-vector combinations. Results indicated for the first time that native CYP Amp is involved in vivo in specific crossing of the gut epithelium and salivary gland colonization during early phases of vector infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, BacterialEntomologyGastrointestinal TractHemipteraInsect ProteinsInsect VectorsMembrane ProteinsMicrobiological TechniquesPhytoplasmaProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingSalivary GlandsAntigens, BacterialInsect ProteinsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26424332
PMCPMC4589916
OpenAlexW2118873315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.