ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2016
The continuing evolution of targeted therapy for inflammatory skin disease.
Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in Transdermal Drug Delivery Systems and Clinical Applications in Inflammatory Skin Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- The epidemiology of inflammatory skin disease in older adults.JAAD international · 2025Article
- Pyoderma Gangrenosum: An Updated Literature Review on Established and Emerging Pharmacological Treatments.American journal of clinical dermatology · 2022Review
- Granuloma annulare arising under systemic psoriasis therapy successfully treated with adalimumab.JAAD case reports · 2020Article
- A Scoping Review Protocol to Explore the Use of Interleukin-1-Targeting Drugs for the Treatment of Dermatological Diseases: Indications, Mechanism of Action, Efficacy, and Safety.Dermatology and therapy · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of inflammatory skin disease has evolved from non-specific suppression of immune cells to increasingly precise targeting and modulation of immune mechanisms at all levels. This has led to dramatic treatment successes and deepened understanding of the pathophysiology. The cycle of in vitro studies, animal models, clinical trials, and case series of non-primary indications is a feedback loop that informs and guides the design of ever better disease models and therapeutic targets. Not only are we constantly discovering new molecules driving skin inflammation, we have also found that psoriasis and other autoimmune conditions are driven by distinct mediators occurring in early and late phases, which could be an opportunity for phase-specific or multipronged interventions. The deeper our mechanistic understanding, the more likely we will be able to discover subtle strategies to reprogram each patients' immune cells without having to dampen or eliminate their protective effects against pathogens and tumors. Lastly, ongoing genomic studies might soon confirm interesting genetic markers for predictive personalized medicine, the earliest currently being evaluated in psoriasis such as HLA-Cw6 and TNFAIP3. Taken together, the continued evolution of immune therapies in skin will potentially allow an unprecedented form of medicine that is not bent on silencing the pathogenic mechanism, but rather aims at using subtle interventions to shepherd the immune cell swarm back on the correct path.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.