Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26423990›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. HIV2014

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of potential responses to future high levels of transmitted HIV drug resistance in antiretroviral drug-naive populations beginning treatment: modelling study and economic analysis.

Andrew N Phillips, Valentina Cambiano, Alec Miners, Paul Revill, Deenan Pillay, Jens D Lundgren, Diane Bennett, Elliott Raizes, Fumiyo Nakagawa, Andrea De Luca and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. HIV, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Differentiated Human Immunodeficiency Virus RNA Monitoring in Resource-Limited Settings: An Economic Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Andrew N PhillipsResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: andrew.phillips@ucl.ac.uk.
Valentina CambianoResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Alec MinersLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Paul RevillUniversity of York, York, UK.
Deenan PillayAfrica Centre, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.
Jens D LundgrenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diane BennettCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Elliott RaizesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Fumiyo NakagawaResearch Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Andrea De LucaUniversity Division of Infectious Diseases, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
Marco VitoriaWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jhoney BarcaroloWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joseph PerriensWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Michael R JordanTufts University School of Medicine and Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Silvia BertagnolioWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: bertagnolios@who.int.
World Health Organization · CHUniversity College London · GBCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBRigshospitalet · DKTufts University · USUniversity of Siena · ITUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999Medical Research Council MC_U122886353World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith continued roll-out of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings, evidence is emerging of increasing levels of transmitted drug-resistant HIV. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different potential public health responses to substantial levels of transmitted drug resistance.

methodsWe created a model of HIV transmission, progression, and the effects of ART, which accounted for resistance generation, transmission, and disappearance of resistance from majority virus in the absence of drug pressure. We simulated 5000 ART programmatic scenarios with different prevalence levels of detectable resistance in people starting ART in 2017 (t0) who had not previously been exposed to antiretroviral drugs. We used the model to predict cost-effectiveness of various potential changes in policy triggered by different prevalence levels of resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) measured in the population starting ART.

findingsIndividual-level resistance testing before ART initiation was not generally a cost-effective option, irrespective of the cost-effectiveness threshold. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of US$500 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), no change in policy was cost effective (ie, no change in policy would involve paying less than $500 per QALY gained), irrespective of the prevalence of pretreatment NNRTI resistance, because of the increased cost of the policy alternatives. At thresholds of $1000 or higher, and with the prevalence of pretreatment NNRTI resistance greater than 10%, a policy to measure viral load 6 months after ART initiation became cost effective. The policy option to change the standard first-line treatment to a boosted protease inhibitor regimen became cost effective at a prevalence of NNRTI resistance higher than 15%, for cost-effectiveness thresholds greater than $2000.

interpretationCost-effectiveness of potential policies to adopt in response to different levels of pretreatment HIV drug resistance depends on competing budgetary claims, reflected in the cost-effectiveness threshold. Results from our model will help inform WHO recommendations on monitoring of HIV drug resistance in people starting ART.

fundingWHO (with funds provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation), CHAIN (European Commission).

Identifiers

PMID26423990
PMCPMC4822192
OpenAlexW2165489934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.